ArticleRheumatology international2021
Validation of the provisional seven-item criteria for the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic Idiopathic Polyarteritis Nodosa Mimicking Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis: A Diagnostic Challenge.Cureus · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review of the Neurological Manifestations of Human Adenosine Deaminase 2 Deficiency.Journal of clinical immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) have many pitfalls and performed poorly when used for diagnostic purposes. Recently, a provisional seven-item diagnostic criteria for PAN was proposed. To validate the provisional seven-item diagnostic criteria for PAN in a cohort of PAN patients from a tertiary care centre in India. Clinical details of patients diagnosed as PAN as per the European Medicines Agency algorithm between 2005 and 2020 were collected retrospectively. Age and sex-matched anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) patients were included in the non-PAN group. Patients with a deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2) were included as a separate group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for ACR criteria, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan diagnostic criteria and the seven-item diagnostic criteria were calculated. Thirty-seven PAN, 14 DADA2 and 37 AAV patients were included in the analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the seven-item criteria were 83.7%, 96.8%, 97.3% and 81.1% respectively. For the ACR criteria, sensitivity was 82.9% and specificity was 79.5%. The sensitivity, specificity for MHLW criteria were 77.3% and 90% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of seven-item criteria for DADA2 patients were 58.8% and 88.2% respectively. There was very poor agreement between the ACR criteria and the seven-item and MHLW criteria and fair agreement between seven-item and MHLW criteria (κ = 0.279). The provisional seven-item criteria for PAN performed well with high specificity and PPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.