Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33904712›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2021

Beyond Tripeptides Two-Step Active Machine Learning for Very Large Data sets.

Alexander van Teijlingen, Tell Tuttle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Assessment of the MARTINI 3 Performance for Short Peptide Self-Assembly.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander van TeijlingenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-8943
Tell TuttleDepartment of Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-8921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-assembling peptide nanostructures have been shown to be of great importance in nature and have presented many promising applications, for example, in medicine as drug-delivery vehicles, biosensors, and antivirals. Being very promising candidates for the growing field of bottom-up manufacture of functional nanomaterials, previous work (Frederix, et al. 2011 and 2015) has screened all possible amino acid combinations for di- and tripeptides in search of such materials. However, the enormous complexity and variety of linear combinations of the 20 amino acids make exhaustive simulation of all combinations of tetrapeptides and above infeasible. Therefore, we have developed an active machine-learning method (also known as "iterative learning" and "evolutionary search method") which leverages a lower-resolution data set encompassing the whole search space and a just-in-time high-resolution data set which further analyzes those target peptides selected by the lower-resolution model. This model uses newly generated data upon each iteration to improve both lower- and higher-resolution models in the search for ideal candidates. Curation of the lower-resolution data set is explored as a method to control the selected candidates, based on criteria such as log

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsComputational ChemistryNanostructuresOligopeptidesProgramming LanguagesProtein ConformationOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID33904712
PMCPMC8278388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.