Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33904264›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2021

Effects of Emergency Care-related Health Policies during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea: a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Yun Suk Pak, Young Sun Ro, Se Hyung Kim, So Hyun Han, Sung Keun Ko, Taehui Kim, Young Ho Kwak, Tag Heo, Sungwoo Moon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yun Suk PakNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-1757
Young Sun RoNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3634-9573
Se Hyung KimNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-3634
So Hyun HanNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-3482
Sung Keun KoNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-2388
Taehui KimNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6897-3712
Young Ho KwakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2062-7575
Tag HeoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. docheo@hanmail.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2333-2169
Sungwoo MoonNational Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-3449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to review the nationwide emergency care-related health policies during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disaster in Korea and to analyze the effects of the policies on the safety of patients who visit emergency departments (EDs) during this period.

methodsThis study is a quasi-experiment study. The study population was patients who visited all 402 EDs in Korea between December 31, 2019 and May 13, 2020, using the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) database. The study period was classified into 5 phases according to the level of national crisis warning of infectious disease and the implementation of emergency care-related health policies, and all study phases were 27 days. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was length of stay (LOS) in the ED during the COVID-19 outbreak.

resultsThe number of ED visits during the study period was 2,636,341, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.4%. The number of ED visits decreased from 803,160 in phase 1 to 496,619 in phase 5 during the study period. For in-hospital mortality, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval) was 0.77 (0.74-0.79) in phase 5 compared to phase 3. Additionally, by subgroup, the ORs were 0.69 (0.57-0.83) for the patients with acute myocardial infarction and 0.76 (0.67-0.87) for severe trauma in phase 5 compared to phase 3. The ED LOS increased while the number of ED visits decreased as the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, and the ED LOS declined after policy implementation (beta coefficient: -5.3 [-6.5 to -4.2] minutes in phase 5 compared to phase 3).

conclusionImplementing appropriate emergency care policies in the COVID-19 pandemic would have contributed to improving the safety of all emergency patients and reducing in-hospital mortality by preventing excessive deaths.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth PolicySARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLength of StayCOVID-19Emergency Care PoliciesQuasi-experimental Study

Identifiers

PMID33904264
PMCPMC8076843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.