ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Sugarcane monoculture drives microbial community composition, activity and abundance of agricultural-related microorganisms.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering Plant-Associated Soil Microbiomes for Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Mechanisms, Technologies, and Applications.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Acid-modified biochar combined with reduced nitrogen fertilizer improves soil organic carbon and cotton yield in saline-alkali soil.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Transcriptome and WGCNA Reveal the Key Genes of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Regulating Sugarcane Growth and Nutrient Absorption.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Synchronized nutrition fertilizer improves soil microbial diversity and sugarcane yield through agrochemical and enzymatic regulation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Effects of chemical fertilization on bacterial community in rhizosphere soil of sugarcane.PloS one · 2025Article
- Construction of high-quality genomes and gene catalogue for culturable microbes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.).Scientific data · 2024Article
- Analysis of rhizosphere fungal diversity in lavender at different planting years based on high-throughput sequencing technology.PloS one · 2024Article
- Plant microbiome technology for sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Free-living bacteria stimulate sugarcane growth traits and edaphic factors along soil depth gradients under contrasting fertilization.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Metabolomics analysis of the effect of acidification on rhizosphere soil microecosystem of tea tree.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Dynamics of rhizosphere bacterial communities and soil physiochemical properties in response to consecutive ratooning of sugarcane.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Characterizing Effects of Microbial Biostimulants and Whole-Soil Inoculums for Native Plant Revegetation.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Sugarcane cultivation practices modulate rhizosphere microbial community composition and structure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Sugarcane Rhizosphere Bacteria Community Migration Correlates with Growth Stages and Soil Nutrient.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Sugarcane cultivar-dependent changes in assemblage of soil rhizosphere fungal communities in subtropical ecosystem.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- An insight to rhizosphere bacterial community composition and structure of consecutive winter-initiated sugarcane ratoon crop in Southern China.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Sugarcane cultivars manipulate rhizosphere bacterial communities' structure and composition of agriculturally important keystone taxa.3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Long-term continuous mono-cropping ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Untangling the Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Composition and Response of Soil Physiochemical Properties to Different Nitrogen Applications in Sugarcane Field.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Response of soil biological properties and bacterial diversity to different levels of nitrogen application in sugarcane fields.AMB Express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugarcane monoculture (SM) often leads to soil problems, like soil acidification, degradation, and soil-borne diseases, which ultimately pose a negative impact on agricultural productivity and sustainability. Understanding the change in microbial communities' composition, activities, and functional microbial taxa associated with the plant and soil under SM is unclear. Using multidisciplinary approaches such as Illumina sequencing, measurements of soil properties, and enzyme activities, we analyzed soil samples from three sugarcane fields with different monoculture histories (1-, 2-, and 4-year cultivation times, respectively). We observed that SM induced soil acidity and had adverse effects on soil fertility, i.e., soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), total carbon (TC), and available potassium (AK), as well as enzyme activities indicative for carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen cycles. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis showed that SM time greatly affected soil attribute patterns. We observed strong correlation among soil enzymes activities and soil physiochemical properties (soil pH, OM, and TC). Alpha diversity analysis showed a varying response of the microbes to SM time. Bacterial diversity increased with increasing oligotrophs (e.g., Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi), while fungal diversity decreased with reducing copiotrophs (e.g., Ascomycota). β-Diversity analysis showed that SM time had a great influence on soil microbial structure and soil properties, which led to the changes in major components of microbial structure (soil pH, OM, TC, bacteria and soil pH; TC, fungi). Additionally, SM time significantly stimulated (four bacterial and ten fungal) and depleted (12 bacterial and three fungal) agriculturally and ecologically important microbial genera that were strongly and considerably correlated with soil characteristics (soil pH, OM, TC, and AK). In conclusion, SM induces soil acidity, reduces soil fertility, shifts microbial structure, and reduces its activity. Furthermore, most beneficial bacterial genera decreased significantly due to SM, while beneficial fungal genera showed a reverse trend. Therefore, mitigating soil acidity, improving soil fertility, and soil enzymatic activities, including improved microbial structure with beneficial service to plants and soil, can be an effective measure to develop a sustainable sugarcane cropping system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.