Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33904117›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Re-engineering Survivorship Care Plans to Support Primary Care Needs and Workflow: Results From an Engineering, Primary Care and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health (EPOCH).

Amye J Tevaarwerk, Xiao Zhang, James Haine, Kirsten Norslien, Mary F Henningfield, Chelsea Stietz, David Hahn, Mary E Sesto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary care providers and their needs caring for cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  4. Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amye J TevaarwerkDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. at4@medicine.wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8087-5119
Xiao ZhangCarbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
James HaineDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Kirsten NorslienGilda's Club Madison, Middleton, WI, USA.
Mary F HenningfieldDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Chelsea StietzUW Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
David HahnDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Mary E SestoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining the health of survivors requires communication, collaboration and care coordination between oncology and primary care. Primary care clinicians have been acknowledged as important recipients of survivorship care plans (SCPs); however, current SCP templates have not been evaluated for usefulness in the primary care context. We surveyed and interviewed primary care clinicians from a rural research network regarding SCP content, format and layout (phase 1), and potential use and clinical workflows around SCPs (phase 2). Based on these data, an existing SCP template was iteratively redesigned to better support survivorship care in the primary care setting. A total of 13 clinicians (9 MDs, 4 APPs) participated. Interviewees advocated for maintaining a single SCP document shared by survivors and clinicians. Changes to the SCP template included prioritizing follow-up over summary of treatment and removing or down-playing screening recommendations not impacted by cancer or cancer treatment. The re-engineered SCP was regarded as highly relevant for survivors, but clinicians noted the significant effort to "disassemble" SCPs in order to enter the information into on the receiving health record. Primary care clinicians value the information in SCPs but had important recommendations regarding content, layout, and format. Additionally, a significant effort appears to be required by recipients in order to extract SCP information for future use.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSurvivorshipHumansMedical OncologyPatient Care PlanningPrimary Health CareWorkflowCancer survivorshipPrimary care clinicianPrimary care information needsPrimary care satisfactionSurvivorship care plansUser-centered care plan

Identifiers

PMID33904117
PMCPMC8546004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.