Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33904057›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Permanent Stoma after Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection.

Junguang Liu, Lijun Zheng, Song Ren, Shuai Zuo, Junling Zhang, Yuanlian Wan, Xin Wang, Jianqiang Tang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junguang Liu *Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Lijun Zheng *Department of General Surgery, the Third People's Hospital of Datong, Datong, 037001, China.
Song RenDepartment of General Surgery, the Third People's Hospital of Datong, Datong, 037001, China.
Shuai ZuoDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Junling ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yuanlian WanDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xin WangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. wangxin_guo@126.com.
Jianqiang TangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. doc_tjq@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9153-6550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for the development of a permanent stoma in laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LS-ISR) for ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma and to develop and validate a prediction model to predict the probability of permanent stoma after surgery.

methodsA primary cohort consisting of 301 consecutive patients who underwent LS-ISR was enrolled in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors and develop the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. An independent validation cohort contained 91 consecutive patients from January 2012 to January 2019.

resultsThe permanent stoma rate was 11.3% (34/301) in the primary cohort and 18.7% (17/91) in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis revealed that nCRT (OR, 3.195; 95% CI, 1.169-8.733; P=0.024), ASA score of 3 (OR, 5.062; 95% CI, 1.877-13.646; P=0.001), distant metastasis (OR, 14.645; 95% CI, 3.186-67.315; P=0.001), and anastomotic leakage (OR, 11.308; 95% CI, 3.650-35.035; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for permanent stoma, and a nomogram was established. The AUCs of the nomogram were 0.842 and 0.858 in the primary and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves showed good calibration in both cohorts. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

conclusionWe developed and validated a nomogram for ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent LS-ISR, and the nomogram could help surgeons identify which patients are at a higher risk of a permanent stoma after surgery.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasHumansNomogramsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsLaparoscopic intersphincteric resectionNomogramPermanent stomaPrediction modelUltralow rectal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.