Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33904036›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Primary Care Access During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Simulated Patient Study.

Michael Anne Kyle, Renuka Tipirneni, Nitya Thakore, Sneha Dave, Ishani Ganguli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael Anne KyleWyss House, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA. mkyle@hbs.edu.
Renuka TipirneniDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nitya ThakoreBrigham and Women's Hospital Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Boston, MA, USA.
Sneha DaveHealth Advocacy Summit, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ishani GanguliBrigham and Women's Hospital Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Improving the Health of Low-SES Americans Approaching Retirement Under the Affordable Care ActK08AG056591 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TIPIRNENI, RENUKA · 2017 to 2021
$836k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG056591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care practices have experienced major strains during the COVID-19 pandemic, such that patients newly seeking care may face potential barriers to timely visits.

objectiveTo quantify availability and wait times for new patient appointments in primary care and to describe how primary care practices are guiding patients with suspected COVID-19.

designTrained callers conducted simulated patient calls to 800 randomly sampled primary care practices between September 14, 2020, and September 28, 2020.

participantsWe extracted complete primary care physician listings from large commercial insurance networks in four geographically dispersed states between September 10 and 14, 2020 (n=11,521). After excluding non-physician providers and removing duplicate phone numbers, we identified 2705 unique primary care physician practices from which we randomly sampled 200 practices in each region. MAIN MEASURES: Primary care appointment availability, median wait time in days, and practice guidance to patients suspecting COVID-19 infection. KEY

resultsAmong 56% of listed practices that had accurate contact information listed in the directory, 84% offered a new patient in-person or virtual appointment. Median wait time was 10 days (IQR 3-26 days). The most common guidance in case of suspected COVID-19 was clinician consultation, which was offered in 41% of completed calls. Callers were otherwise directed to on-site testing (14%), off-site testing (24%), a COVID-19 hotline (8%), or an urgent care/emergency department (12%), while 2% of practices had no guidance to offer.

conclusionsDespite resource constraints, most reachable primary care practices offered timely new patient appointments as well as direct COVID-19 care. Pandemic mitigation strategies should account for and support the central role of primary care practices in the community-based pandemic response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Appointments and SchedulesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2accessambulatory careCOVID-19policy/economicstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33904036
PMCPMC8075018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.