Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903926›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Imaging and liquid biopsy in the prediction and evaluation of response to PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors: implications for patient management.

Wolfgang Roll, Matthias Weckesser, Robert Seifert, Lisa Bodei, Kambiz Rahbar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Head to head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. PET/CT and PET/MRI in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  11. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wolfgang RollDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Matthias WeckesserDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Robert SeifertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Lisa BodeiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Kambiz RahbarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. rahbar@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-4055
University Hospital Münster · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this narrative review is to give an overview on current and emerging imaging methods and liquid biopsy for prediction and evaluation of response to PRRT. Current limitations and new perspectives, including artificial intelligence, are discussed.

methodsA literature review of PubMed/Medline was performed with representative keywords. The search included articles published online through August 31, 2020. All searches were restricted to English language manuscripts.

resultsPeptide radio receptor therapy (PRRT) is a prospectively evaluated and approved therapy option in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Different ligands targeting the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) are used as theranostic pairs for imaging NET and for PRRT. Response assessment in prospective trials often relies on the morphological RECIST 1.1 criteria, based on lesion size in CT or MRI. The role of SSTR-PET and quantitative uptake parameters and volumetric data is still not defined. Monoanalyte tumor marker chromogranin A has a limited value for response assessment after PRRT. New emerging liquid biopsy techniques are offering prediction of response to PRRT and prognostic value.

conclusionsNew response criteria for NET patients undergoing PRRT will comprise multiparametric hybrid imaging and blood-based multianalyte markers. This represents tumor biology and heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeuroendocrine TumorsHumansLiquid BiopsyOctreotidePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesReceptors, SomatostatinOctreotideReceptors, SomatostatinLiquid biopsyNETPRRTSSTR-PET

Identifiers

PMID33903926
PMCPMC8484222
OpenAlexW3157104274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.