Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903717›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Safe and effective protocol for discharge 3 days after cardiac surgery.

Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia, Gabrielle Barbosa Borgomoni, Nilza Lasta, Mariana Yumi Okada, Mariana Silva Biason Gomes, Mary Lee Norris Nelsen Foz, Helga Priscila Giugno Bischoff, Tatiana Saruhashi, Livia Maria Garcia Melro, Márcio Campos Sampaio and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Omar Asdrúbal Vilca MejiaHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. omar.mejia@incor.usp.br.
Gabrielle Barbosa BorgomoniHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nilza LastaHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Yumi OkadaHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Silva Biason GomesHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mary Lee Norris Nelsen FozHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Helga Priscila Giugno BischoffHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiana SaruhashiHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Livia Maria Garcia MelroHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Márcio Campos SampaioHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E SilvaHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Carlos Teixeira GarciaHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Valter FurlanHospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol affected traditional cardiac surgery processes and COVID-19 is expected to accelerate its scalability. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an ERAS-based protocol on the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. From January 2019 to June 2020, 664 patients underwent consecutive cardiac surgery at a Latin American center. Here, 46 patients were prepared for a rapid recovery through a multidisciplinary institutional protocol based on the ERAS concept, the "TotalCor protocol". After the propensity score matching, 46 patients from the entire population were adjusted for 12 variables. Patients operated on the TotalCor protocol had reduced intensive care unit time (P < 0.025), postoperative stay (P ≤ 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P ≤ 0.001). In addition, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and death between the two groups. Of the 10-central metrics of TotalCor protocol, 6 had > 70% adherences. In conclusion, the TotalCor protocol was safe and effective for a 3-day discharge after cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and renal failure were predictors of postoperative stay > 5 days.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryLength of StayPatient DischargePatient SafetyCardiac Surgical ProceduresGuideline AdherenceHumansPatient Care TeamPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity Score

Identifiers

PMID33903717
PMCPMC8076282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.