Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903619›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Motor imagery practice benefits during arm immobilization.

Ursula Debarnot, Aurore A Perrault, Virginie Sterpenich, Guillaume Legendre, Chieko Huber, Aymeric Guillot, Sophie Schwartz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observation of others' actions during limb immobilization prevents the subsequent decay of motor performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ursula DebarnotDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. Ursula.debarnot@univ-lyon1.fr.
Aurore A PerraultDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Virginie SterpenichDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guillaume LegendreDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Chieko HuberDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aymeric GuillotInter-University Laboratory of Human Movement Biology-EA 7424, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Sophie SchwartzDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) is known to engage motor networks and is increasingly used as a relevant strategy in functional rehabilitation following immobilization, whereas its effects when applied during immobilization remain underexplored. Here, we hypothesized that MI practice during 11 h of arm-immobilization prevents immobilization-related changes at the sensorimotor and cortical representations of hand, as well as on sleep features. Fourteen participants were tested after a normal day (without immobilization), followed by two 11-h periods of immobilization, either with concomitant MI treatment or control tasks, one week apart. At the end of each condition, participants were tested on a hand laterality judgment task, then underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure cortical excitability of the primary motor cortices (M1), followed by a night of sleep during which polysomnography data was recorded. We show that MI treatment applied during arm immobilization had beneficial effects on (1) the sensorimotor representation of hands, (2) the cortical excitability over M1 contralateral to arm-immobilization, and (3) sleep spindles over both M1s during the post-immobilization night. Furthermore, (4) the time spent in REM sleep was significantly longer, following the MI treatment. Altogether, these results support that implementing MI during immobilization may limit deleterious effects of limb disuse, at several levels of sensorimotor functioning.

Indexed as

ArmEvoked Potentials, MotorImagery, PsychotherapyImmobilizationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor Cortex

Identifiers

PMID33903619
PMCPMC8076317
OpenAlexW3157486390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.