ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2021
Palliative Medicine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Patients and Caregivers - A Qualitative Study.
Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the evolving role of early palliative care in myelodysplastic syndromes: a 2026 narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- A comic that explains palliative care: how patients experience comic-based educational material.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- Knowledge, feelings, and willingness to use palliative care in cancer patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: a prospective, cross-sectional study in a comprehensive cancer center in Germany.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEvidence-based guidelines call for integration of palliative care within oncology from diagnosis. Misperceptions about palliative care have impeded implementation. Prior research has not examined perceptions about 'palliative care' versus 'supportive care' among patients and caregivers to whom this care is introduced routinely as part of comprehensive cancer care. We conducted a qualitative study of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and their informal caregivers to elicit perceptions of 'palliative care' and 'supportive care' before and after they received integrated primary/specialist palliative care from diagnosis.
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed MDS and caregivers were interviewed about their understanding of 'palliative care' and 'supportive care' at diagnosis and follow-up. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed by an interdisciplinary team.
resultsForty-eight interviews were conducted in total, including with 21 patients and 13 caregivers at diagnosis, and 10 patients and 4 caregivers at follow-up. Initially, 28/34 participants (82%) associated 'palliative care' with death or fear/alarm. At follow-up, 11/14 participants (79%) recognised that 'palliative care' is not only for terminally ill patients, yet 13/14 participants (93%) still felt apprehensive about the term. Initially, 24/34 participants (71%) felt 'supportive care' sounded 'positive' and 12/14 participants (86%) reported this at follow-up. No participant associated 'supportive care' with death or fear/alarm at either time point. Among participants who had a preference, 'supportive care' was the preferred term initially and at follow-up.
conclusionsPatients with MDS and caregivers receiving integrated primary/specialist palliative care from diagnosis responded more favourably to and felt less apprehensive about 'supportive care', initially and at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.