Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903239›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Active sites for ice nucleation differ depending on nucleation mode.

Mark A Holden, James M Campbell, Fiona C Meldrum, Benjamin J Murray, Hugo K Christenson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nanostructured Surfaces Enhance Nucleation Rate of Calcium Carbonate.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Water Binds to Microcline Feldspar (001).The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A HoldenSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; mholden10@uclan.ac.uk jamesmatthewcampbell@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-7615
James M CampbellSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; mholden10@uclan.ac.uk jamesmatthewcampbell@gmail.com.
Fiona C MeldrumSchool of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Benjamin J MurraySchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8198-8131
Hugo K ChristensonSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleation of ice crystals in clouds is poorly understood, despite being of critical importance for our planet's climate. Nucleation occurs largely at rare "active sites" present on airborne particles such as mineral dust, but the nucleation pathway is distinct under different meteorological conditions. These give rise to two key nucleation pathways where a particle is either immersed in a supercooled liquid water droplet (immersion freezing mode) or suspended in a supersaturated vapor (deposition mode). However, it is unclear if the same active sites are responsible for nucleation in these two modes. Here, we directly compare the sites that are active in these two modes by performing immersion freezing and deposition experiments on the same thin sections of two atmospherically important minerals (feldspar and quartz). For both substrates, we confirm that nucleation is dominated by a limited number of sites and show that there is little correlation between the two sets of sites operating in each experimental method: across both materials, only six out of 73 sites active for immersion freezing nucleation were also active for deposition nucleation. Clearly, different properties determine the activity of nucleation sites for each mode, and we use the pore condensation and freezing concept to argue that effective deposition sites have size and/or geometry requirements not of relevance to effective immersion freezing sites. Hence, the ability to nucleate is pathway dependent, and the mode of nucleation has to be explicitly considered when applying experimental data in cloud models.

Indexed as

active sitescrystallizationicenucleationpores

Identifiers

PMID33903239
PMCPMC8106315
OpenAlexW3158153477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.