Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903238›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Pinpointing the neural signatures of single-exposure visual recognition memory.

Vahid Mehrpour, Travis Meyer, Eero P Simoncelli, Nicole C Rust

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sharpened Visual Memory Representations Are Reflected in Inferotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resolving a paradox about how vision is transformed into familiarity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Expectation-dependent stimulus selectivity in the ventral visual cortical pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Priority coding in the visual system.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Two kinds of memory signals in neurons of the human hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vahid MehrpourDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0003-1682-5931
Travis MeyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Eero P SimoncelliFlatiron Institute, Simons Foundation and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10010.ORCID 0000-0002-1206-527X
Nicole C RustDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; nrust@sas.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7820-6696

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
The neural mechanisms responsible for recognizing and remembering novel objects and scenesR01EY020851 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RUST, NICOLE C · 2010 to 2018
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories of the images that we have seen are thought to be reflected in the reduction of neural responses in high-level visual areas such as inferotemporal (IT) cortex, a phenomenon known as repetition suppression (RS). We challenged this hypothesis with a task that required rhesus monkeys to report whether images were novel or repeated while ignoring variations in contrast, a stimulus attribute that is also known to modulate the overall IT response. The monkeys' behavior was largely contrast invariant, contrary to the predictions of an RS-inspired decoder, which could not distinguish responses to images that are repeated from those that are of lower contrast. However, the monkeys' behavioral patterns were well predicted by a linearly decodable variant in which the total spike count was corrected for contrast modulation. These results suggest that the IT neural activity pattern that best aligns with single-exposure visual recognition memory behavior is not RS but rather sensory referenced suppression: reductions in IT population response magnitude, corrected for sensory modulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexMacaca mulattaMemoryNeuronsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyTemporal LobeVisual Cortexcontrastfamiliaritypopulation decodingrecognition memoryrepetition suppression

Identifiers

PMID33903238
PMCPMC8106340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.