Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903226›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Global inequality remotely sensed.

M Usman Mirza, Chi Xu, Bas van Bavel, Egbert H van Nes, Marten Scheffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping subnational gender gaps in internet and mobile adoption using social media data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Toward multiscalar measures of inequality in archaeology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Usman MirzaSchool of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, 6211 LM, Maastricht, The Netherlands; m.mirza@maastrichtuniversity.nl marten.scheffer@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-2672
Chi XuSchool of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, 210023, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-9032
Bas van BavelEconomic and Social History, Utrecht University, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8686-0279
Egbert H van NesEnvironmental Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-104X
Marten SchefferEnvironmental Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; m.mirza@maastrichtuniversity.nl marten.scheffer@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic inequality is notoriously difficult to quantify as reliable data on household incomes are missing for most of the world. Here, we show that a proxy for inequality based on remotely sensed nighttime light data may help fill this gap. Individual households cannot be remotely sensed. However, as households tend to segregate into richer and poorer neighborhoods, the correlation between light emission and economic thriving shown in earlier studies suggests that spatial variance of remotely sensed light per person might carry a signal of economic inequality. To test this hypothesis, we quantified Gini coefficients of the spatial variation in average nighttime light emitted per person. We found a significant relationship between the resulting light-based inequality indicator and existing estimates of net income inequality. This correlation between light-based Gini coefficients and traditional estimates exists not only across countries, but also on a smaller spatial scale comparing the 50 states within the United States. The remotely sensed character makes it possible to produce high-resolution global maps of estimated inequality. The inequality proxy is entirely independent from traditional estimates as it is based on observed light emission rather than self-reported household incomes. Both are imperfect estimates of true inequality. However, their independent nature implies that the light-based proxy could be used to constrain uncertainty in traditional estimates. More importantly, the light-based Gini maps may provide an estimate of inequality where previously no data were available at all.

Indexed as

inequalitynighttime lightremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID33903226
PMCPMC8106331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.