Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903222›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Cortical Responses to the Amplitude Envelopes of Sounds Change with Age.

Vanessa C Irsik, Ala Almanaseer, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Björn Herrmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parallel Age-Related Cochlear Neural Degeneration and Cortical Gain Adaptation in Normal-Hearing Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Complex Impact of Stimulus Envelope on Motor Synchronization to Sound.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Aging Impacts Basic Auditory and Timing Processes.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vanessa C IrsikDepartment of Psychology & the Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada virsik@uwo.ca.
Ala AlmanaseerDepartment of Psychology & the Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada.
Ingrid S JohnsrudeDepartment of Psychology & the Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-1333
Björn HerrmannDepartment of Psychology & the Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-3043
Western University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many older listeners have difficulty understanding speech in noise, when cues to speech-sound identity are less redundant. The amplitude envelope of speech fluctuates dramatically over time, and features such as the rate of amplitude change at onsets (attack) and offsets (decay), signal critical information about the identity of speech sounds. Aging is also thought to be accompanied by increases in cortical excitability, which may differentially alter sensitivity to envelope dynamics. Here, we recorded electroencephalography in younger and older human adults (of both sexes) to investigate how aging affects neural synchronization to 4 Hz amplitude-modulated noises with different envelope shapes (ramped: slow attack and sharp decay; damped: sharp attack and slow decay). We observed that subcortical responses did not differ between age groups, whereas older compared with younger adults exhibited larger cortical responses to sound onsets, consistent with an increase in auditory cortical excitability. Neural activity in older adults synchronized more strongly to rapid-onset, slow-offset (damped) envelopes, was less sinusoidal, and was more peaked. Younger adults demonstrated the opposite pattern, showing stronger synchronization to slow-onset, rapid-offset (ramped) envelopes, as well as a more sinusoidal neural response shape. The current results suggest that age-related changes in the excitability of auditory cortex alter responses to envelope dynamics. This may be part of the reason why older adults experience difficulty understanding speech in noise.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoisePerceptual MaskingYoung Adultagingenvelope trackinghearingneural synchronizationnonsinusoidal signal shape

Identifiers

PMID33903222
PMCPMC8197634
OpenAlexW3159784595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.