ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021
Development of a Broth Microdilution Method for Exebacase Susceptibility Testing.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and structural analysis of dacB variants associated with cephalosporin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- LYSG101: a potent chimeric lysin with therapeutic potential for combatingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Daphnoretin as a potent sortase A inhibitor effectively disarms drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Rapid bacteriolysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Exebacase: A Novel Approach to the Treatment of Staphylococcal Infections.Drugs in R&D · 2022Review
- Direct Lytic Agents: Novel, Rapidly Acting Potential Antimicrobial Treatment Modalities for Systemic Use in the Era of Rising Antibiotic Resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exebacase (CF-301) belongs to a new class of protein-based antibacterial agents, known as lysins (peptidoglycan hydrolases). Exebacase, a novel lysin with antistaphylococcal activity, is in phase 3 of clinical development. To advance into the clinic, it was necessary to develop an accurate and reproducible method for exebacase MIC determination. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) produced trailing MIC endpoints, and exebacase activity was diminished when frozen BMD panels were used. A modified BMD method was developed using CAMHB supplemented with 25% horse serum and 0.5 mM dl-dithiothreitol (CAMHB-HSD). Preliminary quality control (QC) ranges for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 of 0.25 to 1 μg/ml and for Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 of 16 to 64 μg/ml were determined based on the results of a CLSI M23-defined MIC QC tier 1 study. These preliminary QC ranges validated the MIC data generated from a systematic study testing a discrete S. aureus strain collection using CAMHB-HSD to investigate the impact of parameters known to influence susceptibility test results and to evaluate the exebacase MIC distribution against clinical S. aureus isolates. Presentation of these data led to the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) approval of the use of CAMHB-HSD to determine exebacase susceptibility and commencement of a multilaboratory (tier 2) QC study. Use of a standard BMD method and concomitant QC testing provides confidence in the assessment of test performance to generate accurate and reproducible susceptibility data during antibacterial drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.