Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903099›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021

Dual mTORC1/mTORC2 Inhibition as a Host-Directed Therapeutic Target in Pathologically Distinct Mouse Models of Tuberculosis.

Rokeya Tasneen, Deborah S Mortensen, Paul J Converse, Michael E Urbanowski, Anna Upton, Nader Fotouhi, Eric Nuermberger, Natalie Hawryluk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Role of mTOR inBiomedicines · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Delamanid or pretomanid? A Solomonic judgement!The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rokeya TasneenJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Deborah S MortensenBristol Myers Squibb, San Diego, California, USA.
Paul J ConverseJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael E UrbanowskiJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anna UptonTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.
Nader FotouhiTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.
Eric NuermbergerJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Natalie HawrylukBristol Myers Squibb, Global Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USTB Alliance · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to develop more effective and shorter-course therapies for tuberculosis have included a focus on host-directed therapy (HDT). The goal of HDT is to modulate the host response to infection, thereby improving immune defenses to reduce the duration of antibacterial therapy and/or the amount of lung damage. As a mediator of innate and adaptive immune responses involved in eliminating intracellular pathogens, autophagy is a potential target for HDT in tuberculosis. Because Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling to impede autophagy, pharmacologic mTOR inhibition could provide effective HDT. mTOR exists within two distinct multiprotein complexes, mTOR complex-1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex-2 (mTORC2). Rapamycin and its analogs only partially inhibit mTORC1. We hypothesized that novel mTOR kinase inhibitors blocking both complexes would have expanded therapeutic potential. We compared the effects of two mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin and the orally available mTOR kinase domain inhibitor CC214-2, which blocks both mTORC1 and mTORC2, as adjunctive therapies against murine TB when added to the first-line regimen (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol [RHZE]) or the novel bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid (BPaL) regimen. Neither mTOR inhibitor affected lung CFU counts after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment when combined with BPaL or RHZE. However, addition of CC214-2 to BPaL and RHZE was associated with significantly fewer relapses in C3HeB/FeJ mice compared to addition of rapamycin and, in RHZE-treated mice, resulted in fewer relapses than RHZE alone. Therefore, CC214-2 and related mTOR kinase inhibitors may be more effective candidates for HDT than rapamycin analogs and may have the potential to shorten the duration of TB treatment.

Indexed as

Multiprotein ComplexesTuberculosisAnimalsMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2MiceProtein Kinase InhibitorsMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Multiprotein ComplexesProtein Kinase Inhibitorsbedaquilinehost-directed therapyisoniazidlinezolidMycobacterium tuberculosispretomanidpyrazinamiderifampintuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33903099
PMCPMC8373221
OpenAlexW3158131484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.