Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903030›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology2021

Reducing the risk of infection to patients and staff during gynaecological outpatient and ambulatory appointments.

Natalie Farmer, Mary Connor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie FarmerYorkshire and Humberside Deanery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2SF, UK. Electronic address: Natalie.Farmer2@nhs.net.
Mary ConnorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2SF, UK. Electronic address: Mary.Connor@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter explores ways to reduce the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 transmission to women and staff within gynaecology outpatient clinics. The likely routes of transmission are discussed, namely through droplets, aerosols and fomites. Using the 'hierarchy of control' categories, elimination, substitution, engineering, administration and personal protective equipment, practical strategies for modifying virus exposure are presented. The management of specific clinical conditions are reviewed based on advice prepared by the specialist societies in conjunction with each other and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The need to maintain at least a minimal level of gynaecological services is recognised and that this should provide safe, equitable and effective care. Ways to reduce clinic attendance are discussed with the substitution of face-to-face with remote consultations and when this is relevant. Current recommendations for ambulatory procedures, which include colposcopy and hysteroscopy, are considered so that best use is made of reduced resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19GynecologyAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansOutpatientsSARS-CoV-2Gynaecological servicesHierarchy of controlPersonal protective equipmentRemote consultationTriaging referrals

Identifiers

PMID33903030
PMCPMC7970421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.