Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33903011›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2022

Automatic Segmentation of Bone Selective MR Images for Visualization and Craniometry of the Cranial Vault.

Carrie E Zimmerman, Pulkit Khandelwal, Long Xie, Hyunyeol Lee, Hee Kwon Song, Paul A Yushkevich, Arastoo Vossough, Scott P Bartlett, Felix W Wehrli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carrie E ZimmermanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Pulkit KhandelwalDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Long XieDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283; Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hyunyeol LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283; Laboratory for Structural, Physiologic and Functional Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hee Kwon SongDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283; Laboratory for Structural, Physiologic and Functional Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Paul A YushkevichDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283; Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Arastoo VossoughDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Scott P BartlettDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Felix W WehrliDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283; Laboratory for Structural, Physiologic and Functional Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: felix.wehrli@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Solid-State MRI as a Noninvasive Alternative to Computed Tomography for Craniofacial ImagingR21DE028417 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEHRLI, FELIX W · 2019 to 2020
$457k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE028417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesSolid-state MRI has been shown to provide a radiation-free alternative imaging strategy to CT. However, manual image segmentation to produce bone-selective MR-based 3D renderings is time and labor intensive, thereby acting as a bottleneck in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate an automatic multi-atlas segmentation pipeline for use on cranial vault images entirely circumventing prior manual intervention, and to assess concordance of craniometric measurements between pipeline produced MRI and CT-based 3D skull renderings. MATERIALS AND

methodsDual-RF, dual-echo, 3D UTE pulse sequence MR data were obtained at 3T on 30 healthy subjects along with low-dose CT images between December 2018 to January 2020 for this prospective study. The four-point MRI datasets (two RF pulse widths and two echo times) were combined to produce bone-specific images. CT images were thresholded and manually corrected to segment the cranial vault. CT images were then rigidly registered to MRI using mutual information. The corresponding cranial vault segmentations were then transformed to MRI. The "ground truth" segmentations served as reference for the MR images. Subsequently, an automated multi-atlas pipeline was used to segment the bone-selective images. To compare manually and automatically segmented MR images, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were computed, and craniometric measurements between CT and automated-pipeline MRI-based segmentations were examined via Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC).

resultsAutomated segmentation reduced the need for an expert to obtain segmentation. Average DSC was 90.86 ± 1.94%, and average 95th percentile HD was 1.65 ± 0.44 mm between ground truth and automated segmentations. MR-based measurements differed from CT-based measurements by 0.73-1.2 mm on key craniometric measurements. LCC for distances between CT and MR-based landmarks were vertex-basion: 0.906, left-right frontozygomatic suture: 0.780, and glabella-opisthocranium: 0.956 for the three measurements.

conclusionGood agreement between CT and automated MR-based 3D cranial vault renderings has been achieved, thereby eliminating the laborious manual segmentation process. Target applications comprise craniofacial surgery as well as imaging of traumatic injuries and masses involving both bone and soft tissue.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingCephalometryHumansProspective StudiesSkullautomatic segmentationbone selective MRIcraniometry

Identifiers

PMID33903011
PMCPMC8536795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.