ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Differences among sexes in presentation and outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of core temperature management and postoperative continuous renal replacement therapy in extensive aortic arch repair for type A dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Evolving Demographics and Outcomes in Surgically Treated Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Fifteen-Year Regional Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Presentation, management, and clinical outcomes of acute type A dissection: Does sex matter?JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in the Characteristics of Acute Aortic Dissection: Stanford Type A Dissection among Elderly Women in Japan.Juntendo medical journal · 2025Article
- Sex-Related Differences Between Patients Undergoing Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.Cureus · 2024Article
- Sex differences in long-term outcomes following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in DeBakey Type I/II Acute Aortic Dissection Outcomes: The Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- The Gender Gap in Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Analysis of Risk and Outcomes.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023Article
- Risk factors for postoperative acute kidney injury in overweight patients with acute type A aortic dissection.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Gender differences in the dissection properties of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Risk factors and in-hospital mortality of postoperative hyperlactatemia in patients after acute type A aortic dissection surgery.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFemale sex is a known risk factor in most cardiac surgery, including coronary and valve surgery, but unknown in acute type A aortic dissection repair.
methodsFrom 1996 to 2018, 650 patients underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair; 206 (32%) were female, and 444 (68%) were male. Data were collected through the Cardiac Surgery Data Warehouse, medical record review, and National Death Index database.
resultsCompared with men, women were significantly older (65 vs 57 years, P < .0001). The proportion of women and men inverted with increasing age, with 23% of patients aged less than 50 years and 65% of patients aged 80 years or older being female. Women had significantly less chronic renal failure (2.0% vs 5.4%, P = .04), acute myocardial infarction (1.0% vs 3.8%, P = .04), and severe aortic insufficiency. Women underwent significantly fewer aortic root replacements with similar aortic arch procedures, shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times (211 vs 229 minutes, P = .0001), and aortic crossclamp times (132 vs 164 minutes, P < .0001), but required more intraoperative blood transfusion (4 vs 3 units) compared with men. Women had significantly lower operative mortality (4.9% vs 9.5%, P = .04), especially in those aged more than 70 years (4.4% vs 16%, P = .02). The significant risk factors for operative mortality were male sex (odds ratio, 2.2), chronic renal failure (odds ratio, 3.4), and cardiogenic shock (odds ratio, 6.8). The 10-year survival was similar between sexes.
conclusionsPhysicians and women should be cognizant of the risk of acute type A aortic dissection later in life in women. Surgeons should strongly consider operations for acute type A aortic dissection in women, especially in patients aged 70 years or more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.