Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902771›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

The impact of a produce prescription programme on healthy food purchasing and diabetes-related health outcomes.

Julian Xie, Ashley Price, Neal Curran, Truls Østbye

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05978843 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Produce Prescription Benefit Dosage on Redemption

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2024Enrolled242ConditionsFood InsecurityArmsMonetary benefit to purchase fruits and vegetables
NCT06614920 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Food-Insecurity: Plant-Based Food Prescription Program to Improve Health Food Access

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MiamiRan2025 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsHealth Literacy, Nutrition, Healthy, Nutrition Poor, Food InsecurityArmsPlant-Based Food Provision (with or without food prescription), Plant-Based Nutrition Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Changes to Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Waste When Households Receive Free Produce.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advancing Lifestyle Medicine in New York City's Public Health Care System.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian XieDuke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6970-1361
Ashley PriceDuke University, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Suite 400, 2200 W. Main Street, Durham, NC27705, USA.
Neal CurranReinvestment Partners, Durham, NC, USA.
Truls ØstbyeDuke University, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Suite 400, 2200 W. Main Street, Durham, NC27705, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate a Produce Prescription Programme’s utilisation and its effects on healthy food purchasing and diabetes control among participants with type 2 diabetes.

designProspective cohort study using participants’ electronic health records and food transaction data. Participants were categorised as ‘Frequent Spenders’ and ‘Sometimes Spenders’ based on utilisation frequency. Multivariate regressions assessed utilisation predictors and programme effects on fruit/vegetable purchasing (spending, expenditure share and variety) and on diabetes-related outcomes (HbA1c, BMI and blood pressure).

settingPatients enrolled by clinics in Durham, North Carolina, USA. Participants received $40 monthly for fruits and vegetables at a grocery store chain.

participantsA total of 699 food-insecure participants (353 with diabetes).

resultsBeing female and older was associated with higher programme utilisation; hospitalisations were negatively associated with programme utilisation. Frequent Spender status was associated with $8·77 more in fruit/vegetable spending (P < 0·001), 3·3 % increase in expenditure share (P = 0·007) and variety increase of 2·52 fruits and vegetables (P < 0·001). For $10 of Produce Prescription Dollars spent, there was an $8·00 increase in fruit/vegetable spending (P < 0·001), 4·1 % increase in expenditure share and variety increase of 2·3 fruits/vegetables (P < 0·001). For the 353 participants with diabetes, there were no statistically significant relationships between programme utilisation and diabetes control.

conclusionsProgramme utilisation was associated with healthier food purchasing, but the relatively short study period and modest intervention prevent making conclusions about health outcomes. Produce Prescription Programmes can increase healthy food purchasing among food-insecure people, which may improve chronic disease care.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Food SupplyFruitHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrescriptionsProspective StudiesVegetablesClinic community partnershipElectronic health recordsFood insecurityGrocery store transaction dataNutrition incentiveProduce Prescription Programme

Identifiers

PMID33902771
PMCPMC8369461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.