Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902756›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental microbiome2021

Plastics and the microbiome: impacts and solutions.

G Lear, J M Kingsbury, S Franchini, V Gambarini, S D M Maday, J A Wallbank, L Weaver, O Pantos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06107933 (Developmental Impacts of MicroPLastics Exposure in Early Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06107933 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Developmental Impacts of MicroPLastics Exposure in Early Life

TypeobservationalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2023 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsInfant Development, Breast Feeding, Environmental ExposureArmsObservational only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Potential plastic biodegradation in lakes worldwide.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biodeterioration of polyethylene by Bacillus cereus and Rhodococcus equi isolated from soil.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G LearSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand. g.lear@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-4773
J M KingsburyInstitute of Environmental Science and Research, 27 Creyke Rd, Ilam, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
S FranchiniSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
V GambariniSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
S D M MadaySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
J A WallbankSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
L WeaverInstitute of Environmental Science and Research, 27 Creyke Rd, Ilam, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
O PantosInstitute of Environmental Science and Research, 27 Creyke Rd, Ilam, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZNew Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science · NZ

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment C03X1802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global plastic production has increased exponentially since manufacturing commenced in the 1950's, including polymer types infused with diverse additives and fillers. While the negative impacts of plastics are widely reported, particularly on marine vertebrates, impacts on microbial life remain poorly understood. Plastics impact microbiomes directly, exerting toxic effects, providing supplemental carbon sources and acting as rafts for microbial colonisation and dispersal. Indirect consequences include increased environmental shading, altered compositions of host communities and disruption of host organism or community health, hormone balances and immune responses. The isolation and application of plastic-degrading microbes are of substantial interest yet little evidence supports the microbial biodegradation of most high molecular weight synthetic polymers. Over 400 microbial species have been presumptively identified as capable of plastic degradation, but evidence for the degradation of highly prevalent polymers including polypropylene, nylon, polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride must be treated with caution; most studies fail to differentiate losses caused by the leaching or degradation of polymer monomers, additives or fillers. Even where polymer degradation is demonstrated, such as for polyethylene terephthalate, the ability of microorganisms to degrade more highly crystalline forms of the polymer used in commercial plastics appears limited. Microbiomes frequently work in conjunction with abiotic factors such as heat and light to impact the structural integrity of polymers and accessibility to enzymatic attack. Consequently, there remains much scope for extremophile microbiomes to be explored as a source of plastic-degrading enzymes and microorganisms. We propose a best-practice workflow for isolating and reporting plastic-degrading taxa from diverse environmental microbiomes, which should include multiple lines of evidence supporting changes in polymer structure, mass loss, and detection of presumed degradation products, along with confirmation of microbial strains and enzymes (and their associated genes) responsible for high molecular weight plastic polymer degradation. Such approaches are necessary for enzymatic degraders of high molecular weight plastic polymers to be differentiated from organisms only capable of degrading the more labile carbon within predominantly amorphous plastics, plastic monomers, additives or fillers.

Indexed as

BiodegradationBioremediationCommunity dysbiosisMicrobial communityMicroplasticsPlastic additivesPlasticiserPlastic pollutionPlastisphereRafting of pathogens and invasive speciesToxic impact

Identifiers

PMID33902756
PMCPMC8066485
OpenAlexW3158581661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.