Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902713›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2020

Impact of process temperature and organic loading rate on cellulolytic / hydrolytic biofilm microbiomes during biomethanation of ryegrass silage revealed by genome-centered metagenomics and metatranscriptomics.

Irena Maus, Michael Klocke, Jaqueline Derenkó, Yvonne Stolze, Michael Beckstette, Carsten Jost, Daniel Wibberg, Jochen Blom, Christian Henke, Katharina Willenbücher and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The novel oligopeptide utilizing speciesFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. The Role ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  11. Importance ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Irena Maus *Bielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Genome Research of Industrial Microorganisms, Universitätsstr. 27, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Michael Klocke *Department Bioengineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Jaqueline DerenkóDepartment Bioengineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Yvonne StolzeBielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Genome Research of Industrial Microorganisms, Universitätsstr. 27, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Michael BeckstetteHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Microbial Infection Biology / Experimental Immunology, Inhoffenstrasse 7, 38124, Braunschweig, Germany.
Carsten JostDepartment Bioengineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Daniel WibbergBielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Genome Research of Industrial Microorganisms, Universitätsstr. 27, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jochen BlomDepartment Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Christian HenkeFaculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Katharina WillenbücherDepartment Bioengineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Madis RummingFaculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Antje RademacherDepartment Bioengineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Alfred PühlerBielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Genome Research of Industrial Microorganisms, Universitätsstr. 27, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Alexander Sczyrba *Bielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Genome Research of Industrial Microorganisms, Universitätsstr. 27, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Andreas Schlüter *Bielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Genome Research of Industrial Microorganisms, Universitätsstr. 27, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. aschluet@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-310X
Bielefeld University · DELeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy · DEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03SF0440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaerobic digestion (AD) of protein-rich grass silage was performed in experimental two-stage two-phase biogas reactor systems at low vs. increased organic loading rates (OLRs) under mesophilic (37 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) temperatures. To follow the adaptive response of the biomass-attached cellulolytic/hydrolytic biofilms at increasing ammonium/ammonia contents, genome-centered metagenomics and transcriptional profiling based on metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) were conducted.

resultsIn total, 78 bacterial and archaeal MAGs representing the most abundant members of the communities, and featuring defined quality criteria were selected and characterized in detail. Determination of MAG abundances under the tested conditions by mapping of the obtained metagenome sequence reads to the MAGs revealed that MAG abundance profiles were mainly shaped by the temperature but also by the OLR. However, the OLR effect was more pronounced for the mesophilic systems as compared to the thermophilic ones. In contrast, metatranscriptome mapping to MAGs subsequently normalized to MAG abundances showed that under thermophilic conditions, MAGs respond to increased OLRs by shifting their transcriptional activities mainly without adjusting their proliferation rates. This is a clear difference compared to the behavior of the microbiome under mesophilic conditions. Here, the response to increased OLRs involved adjusting of proliferation rates and corresponding transcriptional activities. The analysis led to the identification of MAGs positively responding to increased OLRs. The most outstanding MAGs in this regard, obviously well adapted to higher OLRs and/or associated conditions, were assigned to the order Clostridiales (Acetivibrio sp.) for the mesophilic biofilm and the orders Bacteroidales (Prevotella sp. and an unknown species), Lachnospirales (Herbinix sp. and Kineothrix sp.) and Clostridiales (Clostridium sp.) for the thermophilic biofilm. Genome-based metabolic reconstruction and transcriptional profiling revealed that positively responding MAGs mainly are involved in hydrolysis of grass silage, acidogenesis and / or acetogenesis.

conclusionsAn integrated -omics approach enabled the identification of new AD biofilm keystone species featuring outstanding performance under stress conditions such as increased OLRs. Genome-based knowledge on the metabolic potential and transcriptional activity of responsive microbiome members will contribute to the development of improved microbiological AD management strategies for biomethanation of renewable biomass.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionBioconversionBiogasIntegrated -omicsMetabolic activityMetagenome assembled genomesMethaneMicrobial community structurePolyomics

Identifiers

PMID33902713
PMCPMC8067321
OpenAlexW3031601739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.