SynthesisTrials2021
Systematic review of the use of translated patient-reported outcome measures in cancer trials.
Synthesis in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcome measures for fatigue in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Are Orthopaedic Clinical Trials Linguistically and Culturally Diverse? A Systematic Review.JBJS reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Patient Follow-up After Orthopaedic Outreach Trips - Do We Know Whether Patients are Improving?World journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Cross-cultural validation and reliability of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in a Danish population.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Using Pre-Study Patient Interviews to Refine Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Research of Ustekinumab Induction for Ulcerative Colitis (SIRIUS Study).Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Translation and interpreting services must be considered across the lifecycle of clinical trials.Trials · 2026Article
- Canadian French translation of the BREAST-Q Breast Conserving Therapy module.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of cancer clinical trial network consumers' acceptability of the modular approach to patient-reported outcome measurement: how much of it is "common sense"?Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- The Cutaneous leishmaniasis impact questionnaire: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation in adults with Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Validation of the French-Canadian Version of FAME, a Family Engagement Measurement Tool for the Intensive Care Unit.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026Observational
- A 10-step guide to standardising patient-reported outcomes data collection in healthcare: insights from the health outcomes observatory (H2O) project on overcoming implementation barriers.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- The importance of patient-reported outcomes: A call for their integration in the routine care of patients with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025Review
- Symptom tracking for endometriosis: a systematic review protocol for mobile applications focused on content, inclusivity and features.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Development of a digitalization concept for assessing patient-reported outcomes in the context of a University Cancer Center - a model for use in clinical routine.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Can machine translation match human expertise? Quantifying the performance of large language models in the translation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Unmasking Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in United States Chordoma Clinical Trials: Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Patient-reported outcome measures for life participation in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Decoding clinical trial jargon: helping people understand how safety and quality of life are assessed in cancer trials.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Systematic development of a patient-reported ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure at the University Cancer Center Regensburg.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in clinical trials to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of interventions. Inclusion of participants from different ethnic backgrounds is essential for generalisability of cancer trial results. PRO data collection should include appropriately translated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to minimise missing data and sample attrition.
methodsProtocols and/or publications from cancer clinical trials using a PRO endpoint and registered on the National Institute for Health Research Portfolio were systematically reviewed for information on recruitment, inclusion of ethnicity data, and use of appropriately translated PROMs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders to explore barriers and facilitators for optimal PRO trial design, diverse recruitment and reporting, and use of appropriately translated PROMs.
resultsEighty-four trials met the inclusion criteria, only 14 (17%) (n = 4754) reported ethnic group data, and ethnic group recruitment was low, 611 (13%). Although 8 (57%) studies were multi-centred and multi-national, none reported using translated PROMs, although available for 7 (88%) of the studies. Interviews with 44 international stakeholders identified a number of perceived barriers to ethnically diverse recruitment including diverse participant engagement, relevance of ethnicity to research question, prominence of PROs, and need to minimise investigator burden. Stakeholders had differing opinions on the use of translated PROMs, the impact of trial designs, and recruitment strategies on diverse recruitment. Facilitators of inclusive research were described and examples of good practice identified.
conclusionsGreater transparency is required when PROs are used as primary or secondary outcomes in clinical trials. Protocols and publications should demonstrate that recruitment was accessible to diverse populations and facilitated by trial design, recruitment strategies, and appropriate PROM usage. The use of translated PROMs should be made explicit when used in cancer clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.