Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902698›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2021

Current status of ctDNA in precision oncology for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yan Li, Yuanyuan Zheng, Liwei Wu, Jingjing Li, Jie Ji, Qiang Yu, Weiqi Dai, Jiao Feng, Jianye Wu, Chuanyong Guo

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Liquid biopsy to personalize treatment for metastatic prostate cancer.American journal of translational research · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Cell-Free MethylatedDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, number 1291, Jiangning road, Putuo, Shanghai, 200060, China.
Yuanyuan ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Number 301, Middle Yanchang road, Jing'an, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Liwei WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Number 301, Middle Yanchang road, Jing'an, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Jingjing LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, number 1291, Jiangning road, Putuo, Shanghai, 200060, China.
Jie JiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Number 301, Middle Yanchang road, Jing'an, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Qiang YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Number 301, Middle Yanchang road, Jing'an, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Weiqi DaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, number 1291, Jiangning road, Putuo, Shanghai, 200060, China.
Jiao FengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Number 301, Middle Yanchang road, Jing'an, Shanghai, 200072, China. fengjiao080801@163.com.
Jianye WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, number 1291, Jiangning road, Putuo, Shanghai, 200060, China. wjymail@163.com.
Chuanyong GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, number 1291, Jiangning road, Putuo, Shanghai, 200060, China. guochuanyong@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6527-4673
Tongji University · CN

Funding

Health System Innovation Project of Shanghai Putuo Science and Technology Commission PTKWWS201801, PTKWWS201903Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 19ZR1447700the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002539WBN Hepatology Research Fund of China Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Foundation CFHPC2019031Yangfan plan of Shanghai science and technology commission 20YF1443300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional method used to obtain a tumor biopsy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is invasive and does not evaluate dynamic cancer progression or assess tumor heterogeneity. It is thus imperative to create a novel non-invasive diagnostic technique for improvement in cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment selection, response assessment, and predicting prognosis for HCC. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive liquid biopsy method that reveals cancer-specific genetic and epigenetic aberrations. Owing to the development of technology in next-generation sequencing and PCR-based assays, the detection and quantification of ctDNA have greatly improved. In this publication, we provide an overview of current technologies used to detect ctDNA, the ctDNA markers utilized, and recent advances regarding the multiple clinical applications in the field of precision medicine for HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyLiver NeoplasmsMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineCirculating Tumor DNActDNAHepatocellular carcinomaMethylationMutation

Identifiers

PMID33902698
PMCPMC8074474
OpenAlexW3159836483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.