Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902620›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Contested or complementary healing paradigms? Women's narratives of COVID-19 remedies in Mwanza, Tanzania.

Gerry Mshana, Zaina Mchome, Diana Aloyce, Esther Peter, Saidi Kapiga, Heidi Stöckl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heliyon · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Women's Narratives about COVID-19, Preventive Practices and Sources of Information in Northwestern Tanzania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerry MshanaNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania. gerrymshana@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-7561
Zaina MchomeNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Diana AloyceMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Esther PeterMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Saidi KapigaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Heidi StöcklLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 716458National Bureau of Economic Research 25310.00.01.00.7700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has caused worldwide fear and uncertainty. Historically, the biomedical disease paradigm established its dominance in tackling emerging infectious illnesses mainly due to innovation in medication and advances in technology. Traditional and religious remedies have emerged as plausible options for prevention and treatment of COVID-19, especially in Africa and Asia. The appeal of religious and traditional therapies against COVID-19 in the African setting must be understood within the historical, social, and political context. This study explored how women and community members dealt with suspected symptoms of COVID-19 in Mwanza, Tanzania.

methodsThis study was conducted in Nyamagana and Ilemela districts of Mwanza, Tanzania, between July and August 2020. We conducted 18 mobile phone in-depth interviews with a purposively selected sample of women aged 27-57 years participating in an existing longitudinal study. For safety reasons, smart mobile phones were used to collect the data. Each interview was audio recorded after obtaining verbal consent from the participants. The audio files were transferred to computers for analysis. Four researchers conducted a multistage, inductive analysis of the data.

resultsParticipants reported wide use and perceived high efficacy of traditional remedies and prayer to prevent and treat suspected symptoms of COVID-19. Use was either alone or combined with public health recommendations such as hand washing and crowd avoidance. Despite acknowledging that a pathogen causes COVID-19, participants attested to the relevance and power of traditional herbal medication and prayer to curb COVID-19. Four main factors underline the symbolic efficacy of the traditional and religious treatment paradigms: personal, communal, and official reinforcement of their efficacy; connection to local knowledge and belief systems; the failure of biomedicine to offer a quick and effective solution; and availability.

conclusionsIn the context of emerging contagious illnesses, communities turn to resilient and trusted treatment paradigms to quell fear and embrace hope. To tackle emerging infections effectively, it is essential to engage the broader sociopolitical landscape, including communal considerations of therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

Medicine, African TraditionalAdultComplementary TherapiesCOVID-19Faith HealingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedTanzaniaAfricaBiomedicineCOVID-19Religious healingSARS-CoV-2Traditional medicineWomen

Identifiers

PMID33902620
PMCPMC8072083
OpenAlexW3157363841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.