Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902558›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

Human dental pulp stem cell responses to different dental pulp capping materials.

Chawan Manaspon, Chavin Jongwannasiri, Sujin Chumprasert, Noppadol Sa-Ard-Iam, Rangsini Mahanonda, Prasit Pavasant, Thantrira Porntaveetus, Thanaphum Osathanon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Biological and Mechanical Comparison of Eggshell-Derived Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Hydroxide, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chawan ManasponDental Stem Cell Biology Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chavin JongwannasiriFaculty of Medicine and Public Health, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand.
Sujin ChumprasertOral Biology Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Noppadol Sa-Ard-IamImmunology Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Rangsini MahanondaImmunology Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Prasit PavasantDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thantrira PorntaveetusGenomics and Precision Dentistry Research Unit, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thanaphum OsathanonDental Stem Cell Biology Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. thanaphum.o@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · THChulabhorn Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect pulp capping is a vital pulp therapy for a pin-point dental pulp exposure. Applying a pulp capping material leads to the formation of a dentin bridge and protects pulp vitality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of four dental materials, DyCal

methodsHuman dental pulp stem cells (hDPs) were isolated and characterized. Extraction medium was prepared from the different pulp capping materials. The hDP cytotoxicity, proliferation, and migration were examined. The odonto/osteogenic differentiation was determined by alkaline phosphatase, Von Kossa, and alizarin red s staining. Osteogenic marker gene expression was evaluated using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

resultsProRoot

conclusionThis study demonstrates the favorable in vitro biocompatibility and bioactive properties of ProRoot

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CappingPulp Capping and Pulpectomy AgentsAluminum CompoundsCalcium CompoundsDental PulpDrug CombinationsHumansOsteogenesisOxidesSilicatesStem CellsAluminum CompoundsCalcium CompoundsDrug CombinationsOxidesPulp Capping and Pulpectomy AgentsSilicatesCalcium hydroxideCalcium silicate materialsHuman dental pulp cellsMineral trioxide aggregatePulp capping

Identifiers

PMID33902558
PMCPMC8074430
OpenAlexW3159418661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.