Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902545›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Sensorimotor and body perception assessments of nonspecific chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

R Meier, C Emch, C Gross-Wolf, F Pfeiffer, A Meichtry, A Schmid, H Luomajoki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R MeierProdorso, Walchestrasse 15, CH-8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
C EmchPhysiotherapie im Schutzengel AG, Allmendstrasse 1, CH-6300, Zug, Switzerland.
C Gross-WolfPhysiotherapie im Sonnenheim, Sonnenheim 8, CH-6344, Meierskappel, Switzerland.
F PfeifferZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, CH-8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
A MeichtryZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, CH-8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
A SchmidNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
H LuomajokiZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, CH-8400, Winterthur, Switzerland. luom@zhaw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-4805
Sulzer (Switzerland) · CHSonnenhalde (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Oxford · GBZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

Wellcome Trust 222101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders, causing significant personal and social burden. Current research is focused on the processes of the central nervous system (particularly the sensorimotor system) and body perception, with a view to developing new and more efficient ways to treat chronic low back pain (CLBP). Several clinical tests have been suggested that might have the ability to detect alterations in the sensorimotor system. These include back-photo assessment (BPA), two-point discrimination (TPD), and the movement control tests (MCT). The aim of this study was to determine whether the simple clinical tests of BPA, TPD or MCT are able to discriminate between nonspecific CLBP subjects with altered body perception and healthy controls.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. At one point in time, 30 subjects with CLBP and 30 healthy controls were investigated through using BPA, TPD and MCT on the lower back. Correlations among the main covariates and odds ratios for group differences were calculated.

resultsMCT showed an odds ratio for the presence of CLBP of 1.92, with a statistically significant p-value (0.049) and 95%CI. The TPD and BPA tests were unable to determine significant differences between the groups.

conclusionsOf the three tests investigated, MCT was found to be the only suitable assessment to discriminate between nonspecific CLBP subjects and healthy controls. The MCT can be recommended as a simple clinical tool to detect alterations in the sensorimotor system of nonspecific CLBP subjects. This could facilitate the development of tailored management strategies for this challenging LBP subgroup. However, further research is necessary to elucidate the potential of all the tests to detect alterations in the sensorimotor system of CLBP subjects.

trial registrationNo trial registration was needed as the study contains no intervention. The study was approved by the Swiss Ethics Commission of Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ) reference number 2015-243.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPain MeasurementPerceptionSwitzerlandBack-photo assessmentChronic nonspecific low back painMovement control testTwo-point discrimination

Identifiers

PMID33902545
PMCPMC8077718
OpenAlexW3157402565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.