Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902500›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages.

Jun Sun, Qiuan Wang, Dazhao Cai, Wenxiang Gu, Yiming Ma, Yang Sun, Yangyang Wei, Feng Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jun SunDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Qiuan WangDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Dazhao CaiDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Wenxiang GuDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Yiming MaDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Yang SunDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Yangyang WeiDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China.
Feng YuanDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, 221006, China. Yuanfengspine@outlook.com.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Commission of Health and Family Planning H201630Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province 73022063Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province, China BE2016647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding effects, implant displacement, and foreign body reactions. In this study, we aimed at investigating the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after implanting different interbody fusion cages.

methodsThe finite element (FE) models of anterior cervical disc removal and bone graft fusion (ACDF) with a ZK60 cage and a Ti cage were constructed, respectively. Simulations were performed to evaluate their properties of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on the range of motion (ROM), the deformation of cages, the stress in the cages, bone grafts, and cage-end plate interface. Simultaneously, according to the biomechanical analysis results, the microporous structure of the ZK60 cage was improved by the lattice topology optimization technology and validation using static structure.

resultsThe ROMs in the current study were comparable with the results reported in the literature. There was no significant difference in the deformation of the two cages under various conditions. Moreover, the maximum stress occurred at the rear of the cage in all cases. The cage's and endplate-cage interface's stress of the ZK60 group was reduced compared with the Ti cage, while the bone graft stress in the ZK60 fusion cage was significantly greater than that in the Ti fusion cage (average 27.70%). We further optimized the cage by filling it with lattice structures, the volume was decreased by 40%, and validation showed more significant biomechanical properties than ZK60 and Ti cages.

conclusionThe application of the ZK60 cage can significantly increase the stress stimulation to the bone graft by reducing the stress shielding effect between the two instrumented bodies. We also observed that the stress of the endplate-cage interface decreased as the reduction of the cage's stiffness, indicating that subsidence is less likely to occur in the cage with lower stiffness. Moreover, we successfully designed a porous cage based on the biomechanical load by lattice optimization.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionTitaniumBiomechanical PhenomenaCervical VertebraeFinite Element AnalysisHumansLumbar VertebraeRange of Motion, ArticularTitaniumBiomechanicsCervical spineFinite element analysisFusion cage

Identifiers

PMID33902500
PMCPMC8077704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.