Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902498›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2021

Dedicated MRI staging versus surgical staging of peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer patients considered for CRS-HIPEC; the DISCO randomized multicenter trial.

M P Engbersen, C J V Rijsemus, J Nederend, A G J Aalbers, I H J T de Hingh, V Retel, D M J Lambregts, E J R J Van der Hoeven, D Boerma, M J Wiezer and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04231175 (Dedicated MR Imaging vs Surgical Staging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients; a Multicenter Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04231175 naunknown statusnot on this map

Dedicated MR Imaging vs Surgical Staging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients; a Multicenter Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2019 to 2023Enrolled272ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, MRIArmsDWI MRI of the pelvis, abdomen and thorax
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [BMJ open · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M P EngbersenDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.engbersen@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-2345
C J V RijsemusDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J NederendDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
A G J AalbersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
V RetelDepartment of Psychosocial research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E J R J Van der HoevenDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
D BoermaDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M J WiezerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M De VriesDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E V E MadsenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A R M Brandt-KerkhofDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
S Van KoeverdenDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
P R De ReuverDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
R G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N F M KokDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J LahayeDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

ZonMw 852002003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelecting patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCPM) who might benefit from cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is challenging. Computed tomography generally underestimates the peritoneal tumor load. Diagnostic laparoscopy is often used to determine whether patients are amenable for surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown to be accurate in predicting completeness of CRS. The aim of this study is to determine whether MRI can effectively reduce the need for surgical staging.

methodsThe study is designed as a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of colorectal cancer patients who are deemed eligible for CRS-HIPEC after conventional CT staging. Patients are randomly assigned to either MRI based staging (arm A) or to standard surgical staging with or without laparoscopy (arm B). In arm A, MRI assessment will determine whether patients are eligible for CRS-HIPEC. In borderline cases, an additional diagnostic laparoscopy is advised. The primary outcome is the number of unnecessary surgical procedures in both arms defined as: all surgeries in patients with definitely inoperable disease (PCI > 24) or explorative surgeries in patients with limited disease (PCI < 15). Secondary outcomes include correlations between surgical findings and MRI findings, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life (QOL) analysis.

conclusionThis randomized trial determines whether MRI can effectively replace surgical staging in patients with CRCPM considered for CRS-HIPEC.

trial registrationRegistered in the clinical trials registry of U.S. National Library of Medicine under NCT04231175 .

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresMagnetic Resonance ImagingColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyLaparoscopyNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPeritoneal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSample SizeTomography, X-Ray ComputedTumor BurdenColorectal peritoneal metastasesCRS-HIPECRCTSurgical staging, MRI

Identifiers

PMID33902498
PMCPMC8077799
OpenAlexW3157549949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.