Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33902365›Full record

ArticleChronobiology international2021

Chronotype and risk of post-menopausal endometrial cancer in the California Teachers Study.

Julie Von Behren, Susan Hurley, Debbie Goldberg, Jessica Clague DeHart, Sophia S Wang, Peggy Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronobiology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Sleep Behaviors, Genetic Predispositions, and Risk of Esophageal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie Von BehrenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Susan HurleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Debbie GoldbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jessica Clague DeHartSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2298-3146
Sophia S WangDivision of Health Analytics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Peggy ReynoldsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
CALIFORNIA TEACHERS STUDYR01CA077398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BERNSTEIN, LESLIE · 1998 to 2014
$29.7M
Oil and Gas as Drivers of Climate Change and Health: Developing unique resources to investigate multi-level and diverse effects of exposure to oil and gas wellsU01CA199277 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI LACEY, JAMES V, MARTINEZ, MARIA ELENA · 2015 to 2024
$20.7M
UCSF Environmental Research and Translation for Health Center (EaRTH Center)P30ES030284 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JENNIFER C FUNG, Tracey J. Woodruff · 2020 to 2026
$11.2M
New Biospecimens to Enhance Research in the California Teachers Study CohortUM1CA164917 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI LACEY, JAMES V · 2012 to 2015
$10.1M
Sleep and Cancer: Evaluation of Risk and Insights into MechanismsR01CA207020 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI REYNOLDS, PEGGY · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS NU58DP006344NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077398NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207020NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199277NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164917NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working at night causes circadian disruption and it has been classified as a probable carcinogen. An evening chronotype, or preference for late day activity, has been shown to increase risk for several adverse health effects, such as metabolic disorders and recently, breast cancer. To further explore this emerging area of interest, we examined the association between endometrial cancer (EC) risk, another common cancer in women, and chronotype. The women in this study were members of the California Teachers Study cohort, which was established in 1995. Chronotype was reported on a subsequent questionnaire (Q5), administered in 2012-2013. The women included in this analysis were under age 90 years, were post-menopausal at Q5, and had no hysterectomy. The cancer cases, identified through linkages to the California Cancer Registry, were diagnosed between 1996 and 2014. We used unconditional logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations between chronotype and EC diagnosis. There were 437 EC cases and 26,753 cancer-free controls included in this analysis. Controls were more likely to classify themselves as current morning chronotypes than were cases (39% and 34%, respectively). Compared to morning types, women who were definite evening types had a statistically significantly elevated OR of 1.44 (95% CI 1.09-1.91). This association was more pronounced among obese women as compared to non-obese women. For evening type compared to morning type, the OR among obese women was 2.01 (95% CI 1.23, 3.29) while the OR for non-obese women was 1.12 (95% CI 0.77, 1.63). To our knowledge, the association between EC risk and evening chronotype has not been previously reported, but is consistent with the small body of literature which suggests increased breast cancer risks among evening chronotypes. Because this study was based on a retrospective analysis in a cohort of mostly white female teachers in California, further analysis of chronotype as a potential EC risk factor should be considered in other cohorts and in prospective analyses in order to further explore this relationship.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsPostmenopauseAged, 80 and overCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSleepSurveys and Questionnairescase-controlChronotypecircadian disruptioncircadian rhythmendometrial cancer risk

Identifiers

PMID33902365
PMCPMC9172273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.