Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33901889›Full record

ArticleChemosphere2021

Influence of polymer additives on gas-phase emissions from 3D printer filaments.

Phillip M Potter, Souhail R Al-Abed, Farhana Hasan, Slawomir M Lomnicki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemosphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Lung cell toxicological effects of 3D printer aerosolized filament byproducts.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microplastics and their Additives in the Indoor Environment.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Review
  10. Exposure to chemical substances and particles emitted during additive manufacturing.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip M PotterOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), EPA, Cincinnati, OH, 45268, USA.
Souhail R Al-AbedCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response (CESER), EPA, Cincinnati, OH, 45268, USA. Electronic address: al-abed.souhail@epa.gov.
Farhana HasanDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Slawomir M LomnickiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Louisiana State University · USOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationOhio Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A collection of six commercially available, 3D printer filaments were analyzed with respect to their gas-phase emissions, specifically volatile organic compounds (VOCs), during simulated fused filament fabrication (FFF). Filaments were chosen because they were advertised to contain metal particles or carbon nanotubes. During experimentation, some were found to contain other non-advertised additives that greatly influenced gas-phase emissions. Three polylactic acid (PLA) filaments containing either copper, bronze, or stainless steel particles were studied along in addition to three carbon nanotube (CNT) filaments made from PLA, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), and polycarbonate (PC). The metal-additive PLA filaments were found to emit primarily lactide, acetaldehyde, and 1-chlorododecane. The presence of metal particles in the PLA is a possible cause of the increased total emissions, which were higher than any other PLA filament reported in the literature. In addition, the filament with stainless steel particles had a threefold increase in total VOCs compared to the copper and bronze particles. Two of three CNT-containing filaments emitted compounds that have not been reported before for PLA and PC. A comparison between certain emitted VOCs and their suggested maximum inhalation limits shows that printing as little as 20 g of certain filaments in a small, unventilated room can subject the user to hazardous concentrations of multiple toxic VOCs with carcinogenic properties (e.g., acetaldehyde, 1,4-dioxane, and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate). The use of certain additives, whether advertised or not, should be reevaluated due to their effects on VOC emissions during 3D printing.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorNanotubes, CarbonVolatile Organic CompoundsParticulate MatterPolymersNanotubes, CarbonParticulate MatterPolymersVolatile Organic Compounds3D printingAdditive manufacturingIndoor air qualityPolymer degradationVOCsVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID33901889
PMCPMC8521456
OpenAlexW3153202611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.