Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33901256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Gut bacterial communities across 12 Ensifera (Orthoptera) at different feeding habits and its prediction for the insect with contrasting feeding habits.

Xiang Zheng, Qidi Zhu, Zhijun Zhou, Fangtong Wu, Lixuan Chen, Qianrong Cao, Fuming Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Gut Bacteria ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gut microorganisms ofmSystems · 2024
    Article
  10. Evaluation of the Microbial Quality ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gut bacteria reflect the adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiang ZhengCollege of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7409-0374
Qidi ZhuCollege of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Zhijun ZhouCollege of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Fangtong WuLaboratory of Enzyme Preparation, Hebei Research Institute of Microbiology, Baoding, China.
Lixuan ChenCollege of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Qianrong CaoLaboratory of Enzyme Preparation, Hebei Research Institute of Microbiology, Baoding, China.
Fuming ShiCollege of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-9012
Hebei University · CNHebei Research Institute of Microbiology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect microbial symbioses play a critical role in insect lifecycle, and insect gut microbiome could be influenced by many factors. Studies have shown that host diet and taxonomy have a strong influence on insect gut microbial community. In this study, we performed sequencing of V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene to compare the composition and diversity of 12 Ensifera from 6 provinces of China. Moreover, the influences of feeding habits and taxonomic status of insects on their gut bacterial community were evaluated, which might provide reference for further application research. The results showed that Proteobacteria (45.66%), Firmicutes (34.25%) and Cyanobacteria (7.7%) were the predominant bacterial phyla in Ensifera. Moreover, the gut bacterial community composition of samples with different feeding habits was significantly different, which was irrespective of their taxa. The highest diversity of gut bacteria was found in the omnivorous Ensifera. Furthermore, common and unique bacteria with biomarkers were found based on the dietary characteristics of the samples. However, the bacterial community structure of the Ensifera samples was significantly different from that of Caelifera. Therefore, we concluded that feeding habits and taxonomic status jointly affect the gut bacterial community composition of the samples from Orthoptera. However, the influence of feeding habit dominates when taxonomy category below the suborder level. In addition, the dominant, common and unique bacterial community structure could be used to predict the contrastic feeding habits of insects belonging to Ensifera.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacillotaBacteriaOrthopteraPrincipal Component AnalysisProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33901256
PMCPMC8075264
OpenAlexW3159279855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.