ArticlePloS one2021
Fall risk classification for people with lower extremity amputations using random forests and smartphone sensor features from a 6-minute walk test.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development Technologies for the Monitoring of Six-Minute Walk Test: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring parameter optimisation in machine learning algorithms for locomotor task discrimination using wearable sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Convolutional neural network based detection of early stage Parkinson's disease using the six minute walk test.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Smartphone tests quantify lower extremities dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Gait Monitoring and Analysis: A Mathematical Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Reliability and Accuracy of a Fall Risk Assessment Procedure Using Mobile Smartphone Sensors Compared with a Physiological Profile Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fall Risk Assessment Features in Community-Elderly and Stroke Survivors: Insights from Sensor-Based Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical evaluation of fall risk in older adults who use lower-limb prostheses: A scoping review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Gait Alteration in Individual with Limb Loss: The Role of Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Automated step detection with 6-minute walk test smartphone sensors signals for fall risk classification in lower limb amputees.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- Amputee Fall Risk Classification Using Machine Learning and Smartphone Sensor Data from 2-Minute and 6-Minute Walk Tests.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Experimental Verification of Micro-Doppler Radar Measurements of Fall-Risk-Related Gait Differences for Community-Dwelling Elderly Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Prediction of fall risk among community-dwelling older adults using a wearable system.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comparison of Decision Tree and Long Short-Term Memory Approaches for Automated Foot Strike Detection in Lower Extremity Amputee Populations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Random Forest for Automatic Feature Importance Estimation and Selection for Explainable Postural Stability of a Multi-Factor Clinical Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fall-risk classification is a challenging but necessary task to enable the recommendation of preventative programs for individuals identified at risk for falling. Existing research has primarily focused on older adults, with no predictive fall-risk models for lower limb amputees, despite their greater likelihood of fall-risk than older adults. In this study, 89 amputees with varying degrees of lower limb amputation were asked if they had fallen in the past 6 months. Those who reported at least one fall were considered a fall risk. Each participant performed a 6 minute walk test (6MWT) with an Android smartphone placed in a holder located on the back of the pelvis. A fall-risk classification method was developed using data from sensors within the smartphone. The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Center Walk Test app captured accelerometer and gyroscope data during the 6MWT. From this data, foot strikes were identified, and 248 features were extracted from the collection of steps. Steps were segmented into turn and straight walking, and four different data sets were created: turn steps, straightaway steps, straightaway and turn steps, and all steps. From these, three feature selection techniques (correlation-based feature selection, relief F, and extra trees classifier ensemble) were used to eliminate redundant or ineffective features. Each feature subset was tested with a random forest classifier and optimized for the best number of trees. The best model used turn data, with three features selected by Correlation-based feature selection (CFS), and used 500 trees in a random forest classifier. The resulting metrics were 81.3% accuracy, 57.2% sensitivity, 94.9% specificity, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.587, and an F1 score of 0.83. Since the outcomes are comparable to metrics achieved by existing clinical tests, the classifier may be viable for use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.