Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33901190›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

An insulator blocks access to enhancers by an illegitimate promoter, preventing repression by transcriptional interference.

Miki Fujioka, Anastasiya Nezdyur, James B Jaynes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptional Readthrough Interrupts Boundary Function in Drosophila.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Transcriptional read through interrupts boundary function in Drosophila.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in ThreeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miki FujiokaThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Anastasiya NezdyurThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0246-8155
James B JaynesThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7943-794X
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Insulators: Determinants of chromosome topology and regulatory interactionsR01GM117458 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI JAYNES, JAMES B · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
Non-canonical functions of chromatin insulators and Polycomb-group proteinsR01GM137062 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI JAYNES, JAMES B · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117458NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM137062NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several distinct activities and functions have been described for chromatin insulators, which separate genes along chromosomes into functional units. Here, we describe a novel mechanism of functional separation whereby an insulator prevents gene repression. When the homie insulator is deleted from the end of a Drosophila even skipped (eve) locus, a flanking P-element promoter is activated in a partial eve pattern, causing expression driven by enhancers in the 3' region to be repressed. The mechanism involves transcriptional read-through from the flanking promoter. This conclusion is based on the following. Read-through driven by a heterologous enhancer is sufficient to repress, even when homie is in place. Furthermore, when the flanking promoter is turned around, repression is minimal. Transcriptional read-through that does not produce anti-sense RNA can still repress expression, ruling out RNAi as the mechanism in this case. Thus, transcriptional interference, caused by enhancer capture and read-through when the insulator is removed, represses eve promoter-driven expression. We also show that enhancer-promoter specificity and processivity of transcription can have decisive effects on the consequences of insulator removal. First, a core heat shock 70 promoter that is not activated well by eve enhancers did not cause read-through sufficient to repress the eve promoter. Second, these transcripts are less processive than those initiated at the P-promoter, measured by how far they extend through the eve locus, and so are less disruptive. These results highlight the importance of considering transcriptional read-through when assessing the effects of insulators on gene expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHomeodomain ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsInsulator ElementsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, AntisenseTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticChromatinDrosophila Proteinseve protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsRNA, AntisenseTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33901190
PMCPMC8102011
OpenAlexW3158911214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.