Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33900984›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021

The Expanding Frontier of Outpatient Spine Surgery.

Alex Beschloss, Terrance Ishmael, Christina Dicindio, Chelsea Hendow, Alex Ha, Philip Louie, Joseph Lombardi, Andrew Pugely, Ali Ozturk, Vincent Arlet and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Feasibility and safety of outpatient spine surgery: insights from 555 neurosurgical interventions.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Ultrasound-Triggered Release From Novel Spinal Device.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex BeschlossDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Terrance IshmaelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christina DicindioDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Chelsea HendowDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alex HaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Philip LouieDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Joseph LombardiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Andrew PugelyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ali OzturkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Vincent ArletDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Comron SaifiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, The Spine Center at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2014, inpatient spinal fusion surgery had the highest aggregate cost of any inpatient surgery performed in the United States, costing 12 billion dollars. As the national health care system seeks to improve value-based care, there is increased motivation to perform surgery on an outpatient basis. To ensure improved patient outcomes with this transition, patient selection has become increasingly important to identify who would most benefit from outpatient spine fusion, for example. This demands an improved understanding of the demographics of patients who have been receiving outpatient spine fusion on which the spine surgery community can build to improve cost-effective care delivered.

methodsThe Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, State Ambulatory Surgery Databases, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality databases were queried for demographic data regarding all-cause outpatient spine surgery between 2012 and 2014. Outpatient surgery volume was compared with inpatient surgery volume-which was provided by the State Inpatient Databases.

resultsA total of 1,164,040 spine fusion procedures were identified between 2012 and 2014, of which 132,900 procedures were performed as outpatient surgery (11.4%). Of all fusion procedures amongst 18- to 44-year-old patients, 18.4% were outpatient. A larger proportion of white patients, rather than black or Hispanic patients, underwent ambulatory procedures (12.14% vs 9.53% vs 7.46%, respectively); 16.54% of spinal fusion procedures for patients with private insurance was performed on an outpatient basis. Based on patient income, 76% of all outpatient fusions were performed on patients who live in "not low" income ZIP codes.

conclusionsThere has been a gradual trend toward performing more outpatient spinal fusion procedures over the studied period. This study has also revealed unique trends in the demographics of patients who have received outpatient spine fusion during this time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Indexed as

outpatientspinespine fusion

Identifiers

PMID33900984
PMCPMC8059383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.