Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33900934›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Quantifying Online News Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Text Mining Study and Resource.

Konrad Krawczyk, Tadeusz Chelkowski, Daniel J Laydon, Swapnil Mishra, Denise Xifara, Benjamin Gibert, Seth Flaxman, Thomas Mellan, Veit Schwämmle, Richard Röttger and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Public Engagement with Romanian Government Social Media Accounts during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The end of the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of clinical investigation · 2022
    Article
  20. Mis-Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Konrad KrawczykDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2012-0803
Tadeusz ChelkowskiDepartment of Management in the Network Society, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0297-3650
Daniel J LaydonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4270-3321
Swapnil MishraDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8759-5902
Denise XifaraNupinion, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-8033
Benjamin GibertNupinion, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8457-3137
Seth FlaxmanDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2477-4217
Thomas MellanDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4185-9930
Veit SchwämmleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-6722
Richard RöttgerDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-5947
Johannes T HadsundDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-6694
Samir BhattDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-4611

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19012Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Medical Research Council MR/V038109/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBefore the advent of an effective vaccine, nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as mask-wearing, social distancing, and lockdowns, have been the primary measures to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Such measures are highly effective when there is high population-wide adherence, which requires information on current risks posed by the pandemic alongside a clear exposition of the rules and guidelines in place.

objectiveHere we analyzed online news media coverage of COVID-19. We quantified the total volume of COVID-19 articles, their sentiment polarization, and leading subtopics to act as a reference to inform future communication strategies.

methodsWe collected 26 million news articles from the front pages of 172 major online news sources in 11 countries (available online at SciRide). Using topic detection, we identified COVID-19-related content to quantify the proportion of total coverage the pandemic received in 2020. The sentiment analysis tool Vader was employed to stratify the emotional polarity of COVID-19 reporting. Further topic detection and sentiment analysis was performed on COVID-19 coverage to reveal the leading themes in pandemic reporting and their respective emotional polarizations.

resultsWe found that COVID-19 coverage accounted for approximately 25.3% of all front-page online news articles between January and October 2020. Sentiment analysis of English-language sources revealed that overall COVID-19 coverage was not exclusively negatively polarized, suggesting wide heterogeneous reporting of the pandemic. Within this heterogenous coverage, 16% of COVID-19 news articles (or 4% of all English-language articles) can be classified as highly negatively polarized, citing issues such as death, fear, or crisis.

conclusionsThe goal of COVID-19 public health communication is to increase understanding of distancing rules and to maximize the impact of governmental policy. The extent to which the quantity and quality of information from different communication channels (eg, social media, government pages, and news) influence public understanding of public health measures remains to be established. Here we conclude that a quarter of all reporting in 2020 covered COVID-19, which is indicative of information overload. In this capacity, our data and analysis form a quantitative basis for informing health communication strategies along traditional news media channels to minimize the risks of COVID-19 while vaccination is rolled out.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data MiningHealth ResourcesHumansMass MediaPandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2Social MediaCOVID-19infoveillancepublic healthsentiment analysistext mining

Identifiers

PMID33900934
PMCPMC8174556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.