Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33900786›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.

Benjamin Parrell, Richard B Ivry, Srikantan S Nagarajan, John F Houde

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin ParrellDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Srikantan S NagarajanDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco.
John F HoudeDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

The role of the cerebellum in speechR01DC017091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI John Francis Houde, RICHARD IVRY · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Role of auditory feedback in speech motor control in Alzheimer's diseaseR01DC017696 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS, NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017091NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Individuals with cerebellar ataxia (CA) caused by cerebellar degeneration exhibit larger reactive compensatory responses to unexpected auditory feedback perturbations than neurobiologically typical speakers, suggesting they may rely more on feedback control during speech. We test this hypothesis by examining variability in unaltered speech. Previous studies of typical speakers have demonstrated a reduction in formant variability (centering) observed during the initial phase of vowel production from vowel onset to vowel midpoint. Centering is hypothesized to reflect feedback-based corrections for self-produced variability and thus may provide a behavioral assay of feedback control in unperturbed speech in the same manner as the compensatory response does for feedback perturbations. Method To comprehensively compare centering in individuals with CA and controls, we examine centering in two vowels (/i/ and /ɛ/) under two contexts (isolated words and connected speech). As a control, we examine speech produced both with and without noise to mask auditory feedback. Results Individuals with CA do not show increased centering compared to age-matched controls, regardless of vowel, context, or masking. Contrary to previous results in neurobiologically typical speakers, centering was not affected by the presence of masking noise in either group. Conclusions The similar magnitude of centering seen with and without masking noise questions whether centering is driven by auditory feedback. However, if centering is at least partially driven by auditory/somatosensory feedback, these results indicate that the larger compensatory response to altered auditory feedback observed in individuals with CA may not reflect typical motor control processes during normal, unaltered speech production.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaSpeech PerceptionFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansPhoneticsSpeechSpeech Acoustics

Identifiers

PMID33900786
PMCPMC8740698
OpenAlexW3158471000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.