Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33900565›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2021

Deciphering the Probiotic Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens COFCAU_P1 Isolated from the Intestine of Labeo rohita Through In Vitro and Genetic Assessment.

Md Idrish Raja Khan, Dibyendu Kamilya, Tanmoy Gon Choudhury, Partha Sarathi Tripathy, Gaurav Rathore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Whole-genome sequencing and annotation of probioticMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Vitamin BCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Md Idrish Raja KhanDept. of Aquatic Health and Environment, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Lembucherra, Tripura, 799210, India.
Dibyendu KamilyaDept. of Aquatic Health and Environment, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Lembucherra, Tripura, 799210, India.
Tanmoy Gon ChoudhuryDept. of Aquatic Health and Environment, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Lembucherra, Tripura, 799210, India. tanmoygc@gmail.com.
Partha Sarathi TripathyDept. of Fish Genetics and Breeding, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Lembucherra, Tripura, 799210, India.
Gaurav RathoreFish Health Management & Exotics Division, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetics Resources, Lucknow, 226002, UP, India.
Central Agricultural University · INNational Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a bacterial strain COFCAU_P1, isolated from the digestive tract of a freshwater teleost rohu (Labeo rohita), was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis combined with amplification of species-specific BamHI and barnase genes. The probiotic potential of the strain was evaluated using an array of in vitro tests along with safety and genetic analyses. The isolate showed potent antimicrobial response against several fish pathogenic bacteria, survived a wide pH range (2-9), and was resistant up to 10% bile salt concentration. With regard to the in vitro adhesion properties, the strain showed significantly high in vitro adhesion to mucus, auto and co-aggregation capacity, and cell surface hydrophobicity. The strain was non-haemolytic, able to produce extracellular enzymes, viz., proteinase, amylase, lipase, and cellulase, and showed significant free radical scavenging activity. A challenge study in rohu revealed the strain COFCAU_P1 as non-pathogenic. The presence of putative probiotic marker genes including 2, 3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase, arginine/ornithine antiporter ArcD, choloylglycine hydrolase, LuxS, and E1 β-subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex was confirmed by PCR, suggesting the molecular basis of the probiotic-specific functional attributes of the isolate. In conclusion, the in vitro and genetic approaches enabled the identification of a potential probiotic from autochthonous source with a potential of its utilization in the aquaculture industry.

Indexed as

Bacillus amyloliquefaciensProbioticsAnimalsCyprinidaeIntestinesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacillus amyloliquefaciensGenetic analysisIn vitro assaysLabeo rohitaProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID33900565
OpenAlexW3158663609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.