ArticleBiomedical microdevices2021
Magnetic probe-based microrheology reveals local softening and stiffening of 3D collagen matrices by fibroblasts.
Article in Biomedical microdevices, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microscale Mechanical Cues in Hydrogels: Engineering Strategies to Modulate Cell Fates in Three Dimensions.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Cell-Extracellular Matrix Feedback Results in Spontaneous Cell Polarization and Heterogeneous Remodeling in 3D Isotropic and Aligned Discrete-Fiber Models of Cell-Mediated Remodeling.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2026Article
- Piezo1 regulates remodeling of skin-derived extracellular matrix by embedded umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in a stiffness-dependent fashion.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Guidance for 3D traction force microscopy today and in the next decade.Nature methods · 2026Review
- The role of non-linear viscoelastic hydrogel mechanics in cell culture and transduction.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Elasticity-Driven Nanomechanical Interaction to Improve the Targeting Ability of Lipid Nanoparticles in the Malignant Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Probabilistic analysis of spatial viscoelastic cues in 3D cell culture using magnetic microrheometry.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Viscoelasticity in 3D Cell Culture and Regenerative Medicine: Measurement Techniques and Biological Relevance.ACS materials Au · 2024Review
- Unexpected softening of a fibrous matrix by contracting inclusions.Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Engineered Synthetic Matrices for Human Intestinal Organoid Culture and Therapeutic Delivery.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Fibrin Stiffness Regulates Phenotypic Plasticity of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Comparative mucomic analysis of three functionally distinct Cornu aspersum Secretions.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
- Nanoscale Tracking Combined with Cell-Scale Microrheology Reveals Stepwise Increases in Force Generated by Cancer Cell Protrusions.Nano letters · 2022Article
- Cell mediated remodeling of stiffness matched collagen and fibrin scaffolds.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Pertinent Role of Cell and Matrix Mechanics in Cell Adhesion and Migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in extracellular matrix stiffness impact a variety of biological processes including cancer progression. However, cells also actively remodel the matrices they interact with, dynamically altering the matrix mechanics they respond to. Further, cells not only react to matrix stiffness, but also have a distinct reaction to matrix viscoelasticity. The impact of cell-driven matrix remodeling on matrix stiffness and viscoelasticity at the microscale remains unclear, as existing methods to measure mechanics are largely at the bulk scale or probe only the surface of matrices, and focus on stiffness. Yet, establishing the impact of the matrix remodeling at the microscale is crucial to obtaining an understanding of mechanotransduction in biological matrices, and biological matrices are not just elastic, but are viscoelastic. Here, we advanced magnetic probe-based microrheology to overcome its previous limitations in measuring viscoelasticity at the cell-size-scale spatial resolution within 3D cell cultures that have tissue-relevant stiffness levels up to a Young's modulus of 0.5 kPa. Our magnetic microrheometers exert controlled magnetic forces on magnetic microprobes within reconstituted extracellular matrices and detect microprobe displacement responses to measure matrix viscoelasticity and determine the frequency-dependent shear modulus (stiffness), the loss tangent, and spatial heterogeneity. We applied these tools to investigate how microscale viscoelasticity of collagen matrices is altered by fibroblast cells as they contract collagen gels, a process studied extensively at the macroscale. Interestingly, we found that fibroblasts first soften the matrix locally over the first 32 hours of culture, and then progressively stiffen the matrix thereafter. Fibroblast activity also progressively increased the matrix loss tangent. We confirmed that the softening is caused by matrix-metalloproteinase-mediated collagen degradation, whereas stiffening is associated with local alignment and densification of collagen fibers around the fibroblasts. This work paves the way for the use of measurement systems that quantify microscale viscoelasticity within 3D cell cultures for studies of cell-matrix interactions in cancer progression and other areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.