Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33900046›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2021

Effects of ectoine containing nasal spray and eye drops on symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Anne M Salapatek, Nina Werkhäuser, Basma Ismail, Ralph Mösges, Esther Raskopf, Andreas Bilstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Plasma Metabolomics Profiles in Prodromal and Clinical Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne M SalapatekCliantha Research, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3224-5673
Nina WerkhäuserBitop AG, Witten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-0061
Basma IsmailCliantha Research, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Ralph MösgesCRI-Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1928-810X
Esther RaskopfCRI-Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-8593
Andreas BilsteinBitop AG, Witten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-2520
Bitop (Germany) · DE

Funding

bitop AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients are often dissatisfied with the symptom control obtained from available pharmacological treatments for seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). Therefore, patients seek for alternative, nonpharmacological options to treat their symptoms. Here, we assessed the efficacy of ectoine nasal spray and ectoine eye drops in comparison to placebo to prevent nasal and ocular symptoms following exposure to pollen in patients with ARC.

methodsIn this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 46 patients with ARC applied ectoine eye drops and nasal spray in immediate succession or placebo eye drops and nasal spray for 13 days before ARC symptoms were induced in an environmental exposure chamber. Primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted area under the curve (AUC) posttreatment total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and the total ocular symptom score (TOSS) using analysis of covariance. Secondary endpoints were, amongst others, total nonnasal symptoms score (TNNSS) and nasal patency (measured using acoustic rhinometry).

resultsTreatment with both ectoine and placebo reduced TNSS, TOSS, and TNNSS upon allergen exposure. The analysis of parameters at baseline and after allergen exposure demonstrated that ectoine induced a clinically relevant improvement in ARC symptoms compared to placebo: the least square mean difference for baseline-adjusted AUC was -1.87 for TNSS, -1.45 for TOSS and -2.20 for TNNSS. The mean change from baseline AUC of TNNSS for ectoine was also significantly greater than for placebo (-5.49 vs. -3.46; p = 0.011). Ectoine significantly improved the singular symptoms "sneezing," "watery eyes" and "itchy eyes" (p ≤ 0.021) as well as "itchy ear/palate" (p = 0.036) in comparison to placebo. Mean cross sectional areas of the nasal cavity were reduced to a lesser extent after treatment with ectoine (-0.020 ± 0.022) than with placebo (-0.047 ± 0.029). The current study also demonstrated a very good safety profile of ectoine treatment. Few AEs with comparable numbers in both treatment groups were reported during the study, which were mild in severity and resolved without medical treatment.

conclusionThe study suggests that ectoine is effective in reducing nasal and ocular symptoms associated with ARC. Being a natural, bacteria derived stress protection molecule functioning by a physical mode of action, it therefore represents an alternative nonpharmacological treatment option.

Indexed as

Allergische RhinoconjunctivitisARCEctoinectoineEECenvironmental exposure chamberGesamt-Augen-Symptom-ScoreGesamt-Nasen-Symptom-ScorePollenkammerseasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitistotal nasal symptom scoretotal ocular symptom score

Identifiers

PMID33900046
PMCPMC8099269
OpenAlexW3141562357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.