Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33899812›Full record

ArticleJournal of glaucoma2021

Superficial and Deep Macula Vessel Density in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucoma Eyes.

Nevin W El-Nimri, Patricia Isabel C Manalastas, Linda M Zangwill, James A Proudfoot, Christopher Bowd, Huiyuan Hou, Sasan Moghimi, Rafaella C Penteado, Jasmin Rezapour, Eren Ekici and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of glaucoma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nevin W El-NimriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Patricia Isabel C ManalastasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Linda M ZangwillDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
James A ProudfootDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Christopher BowdDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Huiyuan HouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Sasan MoghimiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Rafaella C PenteadoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Jasmin RezapourDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Eren EkiciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Takuhei ShojiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Elham GhahariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Adeleh YarmohammadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Robert N WeinrebDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Funding

African Descent And Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES)U10EY014267 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2002 to 2010
$13.2M
Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma:Structural AssessmentR01EY011008 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 1995 to 2015
$8.7M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): High Myopia and Advanced DiseaseR01EY027510 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyR01EY029058 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011008NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027510NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029058NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

precisMacular superficial capillary plexus (SCP) vessel density is more informative than deep capillary plexus (DCP) vessel density for the detection of glaucoma. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize optical coherence tomography angiography macular SCP and projection-resolved DCP vessel densities and compare their diagnostic accuracies with ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma eyes. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-eight eyes of 44 healthy subjects, 26 eyes of 16 preperimetric glaucoma suspects, and 161 eyes of 124 glaucoma patients from the Diagnostics Innovations in Glaucoma Study with good quality high-density 6×6 mm2 macula optical coherence tomography angiography images were included. The diagnostic accuracy of SCP vessel density, projection-resolved DCP vessel density and GCC thickness were compared among groups.

resultsMean whole image vessel density (wiVD; % of area occupied by vessels containing flowing blood) in the SCP layer was highest in healthy eyes (49.7%), followed by glaucoma suspect eyes (46.0%), and glaucoma eyes (40.9%) (P<0.001). Mean wiVD in the DCP layer was similar in healthy (50.6%), glaucoma suspect (47.3%), and glaucoma eyes (45.7%) (P=0.925). Diagnostic accuracy of both GCC thickness and SCP wiVD was significantly higher than DCP wiVD for classifying healthy and glaucoma eyes [adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval): GCC=0.86 (0.72, 0.94), SCP=0.80 (0.66, 0.91) and DCP=0.44 (0.30, 0.57)] (P<0.001).

conclusionsSCP vessel densities have better diagnostic accuracy for detecting glaucoma than DCP vessel densities. Although the diagnostic accuracy of the macula SCP is relatively modest, it is more informative than the DCP.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleMacula LuteaCross-Sectional StudiesFluorescein AngiographyHumansIntraocular PressureNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID33899812
PMCPMC8169636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.