Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33899434›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2021

[Artificial intelligence based Chinese clinical trials eligibility criteria classification].

Hui Zong, Zeyu Zhang, Jinxuan Yang, Jianbo Lei, Zuofeng Li, Tianyong Hao, Xiaoyan Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ZongSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P.R.China.
Zeyu ZhangSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P.R.China.
Jinxuan YangSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P.R.China.
Jianbo LeiCenter for Medical Informatics, Peking University, Beijing 100080, P.R.China.
Zuofeng LiPhilips Research China, Shanghai 200072, P.R.China.
Tianyong HaoSchool of Computer Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, P.R.China.
Xiaoyan ZhangSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P.R.China.
Tongji University · CNPeking University · CNPhilips (China) · CNSouth China Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subject recruitment is a key component that affects the progress and results of clinical trials, and generally conducted with eligibility criteria (includes inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria). The semantic category analysis of eligibility criteria can help optimizing clinical trials design and building automated patient recruitment system. This study explored the automatic semantic categories classification of Chinese eligibility criteria based on artificial intelligence by academic shared task. We totally collected 38 341 annotated eligibility criteria sentences and predefined 44 semantic categories. A total of 75 teams participated in competition, with 27 teams having submitted system outputs. Based on the results, we found out that most teams adopted mixed models. The mainstream resolution was applying pre-trained language models capable of providing rich semantic representation, which were combined with neural network models and used to fine-tune the models with reference to classifier tasks, and finally improved classification performance could be obtained by ensemble modeling. The best-performing system achieved a macro

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLanguageChinaHumansNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligenceclinical trialeligibility criterianatural language processingtext classification

Identifiers

PMID33899434
PMCPMC10307579
OpenAlexW3157593324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.