ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021
Assessing Differences in Lymph Node Metastasis Based Upon Sex in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning predictive models and risk factors for lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Lung cancer in females-sex-based differences from males in epidemiology, biology, and outcomes: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsWhether sex has any impact on the risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to objectively compared the risk of LNM between female and male patients with early-stage NSCLC so as to figure out whether sex-different extent of surgery may be justified for treating these patients.
methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data of patients undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy with systematic hilar and mediastinal LN dissection for clinical stage IA peripheral NSCLC from June 2014 to April 2019. Both multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score-matched(PSM) analysis were applied to compare the risk of LNM between female and male patients.
resultsWe finally included a total of 660 patients for analysis. In the analysis of unmatched cohorts, there was no significant different rate of LNM (12.4% Vs 13.9%, P=0.556), hilar/intrapulmonary LNM (8.4% Vs 10.7%, P=0.318) and mediastinal LNM(7.9% Vs 7.5%, P=0.851) between female and male patients. In the multivariate analysis, sex was not found to be an independent predictor of LN in these patients. Moreover, in the analysis of well-matched cohorts generated by PSM analysis, there was still no significant different rate of LNM (13.8% Vs 13.4%, P=0.892), hilar/intrapulmonary LNM (9.1% Vs 11.2%, P=0.442) and mediastinal LNM (9.1% Vs 6.5%, P=0.289) between female and male patients.
conclusionsSex was not an independent predictor of LNM in early-stage NSCLC and there is no sufficient evidence justifying for sex-different extent of surgical resection for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.