Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33899049›Full record

ReviewDiscover materials2021

Big data and machine learning for materials science.

Jose F Rodrigues, Larisa Florea, Maria C F de Oliveira, Dermot Diamond, Osvaldo N Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Machine-Guided Discovery of Acrylate Photopolymer Compositions.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose F RodriguesInstitute of Mathematical Sciences and Computing, University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Larisa FloreaSFI Research Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria C F de OliveiraInstitute of Mathematical Sciences and Computing, University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Dermot DiamondInsight Centre for Data Analytics, National Centre for Sensor Research, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Dublin, Ireland.
Osvaldo N OliveiraSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, SP Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we review aspects of leading-edge research and innovation in materials science that exploit big data and machine learning (ML), two computer science concepts that combine to yield computational intelligence. ML can accelerate the solution of intricate chemical problems and even solve problems that otherwise would not be tractable. However, the potential benefits of ML come at the cost of big data production; that is, the algorithms demand large volumes of data of various natures and from different sources, from material properties to sensor data. In the survey, we propose a roadmap for future developments with emphasis on computer-aided discovery of new materials and analysis of chemical sensing compounds, both prominent research fields for ML in the context of materials science. In addition to providing an overview of recent advances, we elaborate upon the conceptual and practical limitations of big data and ML applied to materials science, outlining processes, discussing pitfalls, and reviewing cases of success and failure.

Indexed as

Big dataChemical sensorsDeep learningEvolutionary algorithmsInternet of ThingsMachine learningMaterials discovery

Identifiers

PMID33899049
PMCPMC8054236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.