ArticleJAMIA open2021
Annotation and initial evaluation of a large annotated German oncological corpus.
Article in JAMIA open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The word and the way: strategies for domain-specific BERT pre-training in German medical NLP.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- An end-to-end system for explainable clinical coding across languages and diverse medical data sources.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Cross- & multi-lingual medication detection: a transformer-based analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Can open source large language models be used for tumor documentation in Germany?-An evaluation on urological doctors' notes.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Review
- Hierarchical embedding attention for overall survival prediction in lung cancer from unstructured EHRs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
- Hybrid natural language processing tool for semantic annotation of medical texts in Spanish.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A Transformer-Based Pipeline for German Clinical Document De-Identification.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- BELB: a biomedical entity linking benchmark.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Review
- Exploring the Latest Highlights in Medical Natural Language Processing across Multiple Languages: A Survey.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- A distributable German clinical corpus containing cardiovascular clinical routine doctor's letters.Scientific data · 2023Article
- German Medical Named Entity Recognition Model and Data Set Creation Using Machine Translation and Word Alignment: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Linguistic and ontological challenges of multiple domains contributing to transformed health ecosystems.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- An overview of biomedical entity linking throughout the years.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Review
- Article
- Automatic extraction of 12 cardiovascular concepts from German discharge letters using pre-trained language models.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe present the Berlin-Tübingen-Oncology corpus (BRONCO), a large and freely available corpus of shuffled sentences from German oncological discharge summaries annotated with diagnosis, treatments, medications, and further attributes including negation and speculation. The aim of BRONCO is to foster reproducible and openly available research on Information Extraction from German medical texts. MATERIALS AND
methodsBRONCO consists of 200 manually deidentified discharge summaries of cancer patients. Annotation followed a structured and quality-controlled process involving 2 groups of medical experts to ensure consistency, comprehensiveness, and high quality of annotations. We present results of several state-of-the-art techniques for different IE tasks as baselines for subsequent research.
resultsThe annotated corpus consists of 11 434 sentences and 89 942 tokens, annotated with 11 124 annotations for medical entities and 3118 annotations of related attributes. We publish 75% of the corpus as a set of shuffled sentences, and keep 25% as held-out data set for unbiased evaluation of future IE tools. On this held-out dataset, our baselines reach depending on the specific entity types F1-scores of 0.72-0.90 for named entity recognition, 0.10-0.68 for entity normalization, 0.55 for negation detection, and 0.33 for speculation detection. DISCUSSION: Medical corpus annotation is a complex and time-consuming task. This makes sharing of such resources even more important.
conclusionTo our knowledge, BRONCO is the first sizable and freely available German medical corpus. Our baseline results show that more research efforts are necessary to lift the quality of information extraction in German medical texts to the level already possible for English.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.