ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2021
Evaluation of image quality of a novel computed tomography metal artifact management technique on an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-based metal artifact reduction in CT for head and neck radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- The accuracy of Eclipse AXB and AAA dose algorithms with dental amalgam.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- [Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm Combined With Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Technique Improves Image Quality of Upper Abdominal CT in Critically Ill Patients].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Article
- Phantom study for CT artifacts of dental titanium implants and zirconia upper structures: the effects of occlusal plane angle setting and SEMAR algorithm.Oral radiology · 2024Article
- Needle artifact reduction during interventional CT procedures using a silver filter.BMC biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Benefits and considerations in using a novel computed tomography system optimized for radiotherapy planning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- How to treat stiffness after proximal humeral fractures?EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- The impact of a metal artefact reduction algorithm on treatment planning for patients undergoing radiotherapy of the pelvis.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeArtefacts caused by dental amalgam implants present a common challenge in computed tomography (CT) and therefore treatment planning dose calculations. The goal was to perform a quantitative image quality analysis of our Artifact Management for Proton Planning (AMPP) algorithm which used gantry tilts for managing metal artefacts on Head and Neck (HN) CT scans and major vendors' commercial approaches. MATERIALS AND
methodsMetal artefact reduction (MAR) algorithms were evaluated using an anthropomorphic phantom with a removable jaw for the acquisition of images with and without (baseline) metal artifacts. AMPP made use of two angled CT scans to generate one artifact-reduced image set. The MAR algorithms from four vendors were applied to the images with artefacts and the analysis was performed with respective baselines. Planar HU difference maps and volumetric HU differences were analyzed.
resultsAMPP algorithm outperformed all vendors' commercial approaches in the elimination of artefacts in the oropharyngeal region, showing the lowest percent of pixels outside +- 20 HU criteria, 4%; whereas those in the MAR-corrected images ranged from 26% to 67%. In the region of interest within the affected slices, the commercial MAR algorithms showed inconsistent performance, whereas the AMPP algorithm performed consistently well throughout the phantom's posterior region.
conclusionsA novel MAR algorithm was evaluated and compared to four commercial algorithms using an anthropomorphic phantom. Unanimously, the analysis showed the AMPP algorithm outperformed vendors' commercial approaches, showing the potential to be broadly implemented, improve visualizations in patient anatomy and provide accurate HU information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.