ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2021
Single isocenter treatment planning techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple cranial metastases.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Versus Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy for Single Isocenter Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Multiple Brain Metastases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein do not reflect neuronal or glial damage during different intracranial radiotherapy regimes: a pilot study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Fast stereotactic radiosurgery planning using patient-specific beam angle optimization and automation.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWhole brain radiation therapy use has decreased in favor of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of multiple brain metastases due to reduced neurotoxicity. Here we compare two single isocenter radiosurgery planning techniques, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) in terms of their dosimetric and delivery performance. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixteen patients with 2- 18 brain metastases (total 103; median 4) previously treated with single fraction SRS were replanned for multiple lesion single isocenter treatments using VMAT and DCA using different treatment planning systems for each and three different plan geometries for DCA. Plans were evaluated using the Paddick conformity index, normal tissue V
resultsConformity was not significantly different between VMAT and DCA plans. VMAT plans showed a trend towards higher MU with a median difference between 18% and 24% (p ≤ 0.09). Median V
conclusionsIn most cases DCA plans were found to be dosimetrically superior to VMAT plans with reduced V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.