ArticleInternational journal of women's dermatology2020
Impact of a case-based collaborative learning curriculum on knowledge and learning preferences of dermatology residents.
Article in International journal of women's dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of case-based collaborative learning in radiology residency: experience report of an international educational experience adapted to the Brazilian context.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Flipping the curriculum for resident didactics: In-Training and certifying examination scores in an internal medicine residency.PloS one · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Small Group Teaching and Case-Based Learning on Optometry Students' Binocular Vision Clinical Knowledge.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2025Article
- Increasing Collaborative Discussion in Case-Based Learning Improves Student Engagement and Knowledge Acquisition.Medical science educator · 2022Article
- Improving Medical Education: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCase-based collaborative learning (CBCL) models that incorporate learner-guided content review, structured preparatory assessment, and interactive case-based classroom sessions have been shown to promote content mastery among medical students. However, limited research has explored the viability of CBCL in resident populations, particularly in dermatology. We therefore sought to investigate the impact of a CBCL curriculum covering complex medical dermatology topics on resident knowledge and learning preferences.
methodsThis prospective cohort study included dermatology and combined internal medicine-dermatology resident trainees of all levels (postgraduate years 2-5) in a single residency program in Boston, Massachusetts. Four CBCL sessions covering complex medical dermatology topics were delivered to program residents between March and April 2019. Preparatory material for each session included a 20-minute concept video and a multiple-choice readiness assessment. During the sessions, residents applied their nascent understanding to newly introduced clinical vignettes and cases covering the preassigned materials. To assess knowledge and learner preferences, 15-question surveys were administered before and immediately after curriculum delivery. Changes in knowledge and learner preferences were determined using Student
resultsOf the 30 residents, 29 (96.7%) completed the precurriculum survey and 17 (56.7%) completed the postcurriculum survey. Mean content scores improved significantly (
conclusionIn this single-center prospective cohort study, resident knowledge improved significantly after CBCL curriculum delivery. Most resident learners viewed the curriculum as worthwhile and preferred it to traditional lecture-based didactics. Collectively, our findings suggest that CBCL models can be feasibly implemented and durably convey complex content to resident learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.