Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898624›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Coronary Vessel Segmentation by Coarse-to-Fine Strategy Using U-nets.

Le Nhi Lam Thuy, Tan Dat Trinh, Le Hoang Anh, Jin Young Kim, Huynh Trung Hieu, Pham The Bao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Le Nhi Lam ThuyInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9527-9275
Tan Dat TrinhInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-612X
Le Hoang AnhInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Vietnam.
Jin Young KimElectronics and Computer Engineering Department, Chonnam National University, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4896-8980
Huynh Trung HieuIndustrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2097-0704
Pham The BaoInformation Science Faculty, Sai Gon University, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-4366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each level of the coronary artery has different sizes and properties. The primary coronary arteries usually have high contrast to the background, while the secondary coronary arteries have low contrast to the background and thin structures. Furthermore, several small vessels are disconnected or broken up vascular segments. It is a challenging task to use a single model to segment all coronary artery sizes. To overcome this problem, we propose a novel segmenting method for coronary artery extraction from angiograms based on the primary and secondary coronary artery. Our method is a coarse-to-fine strategic approach for extracting coronary arteries in many different sizes. We construct the first U-net model to segment the main coronary artery extraction and build a new algorithm to determine the junctions of the main coronary artery with the secondary coronary artery. Using these junctions, we determine regions of the secondary coronary arteries (rectangular regions) for a secondary coronary artery-extracted segment with the second U-net model. The experiment result is 76.40% in terms of Dice coefficient on coronary X-ray datasets. The proposed approach presents its potential in coronary vessel segmentation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCoronary VesselsDatabases as TopicHumansX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID33898624
PMCPMC8052146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.